Joined: 03 Feb 2006
Posts: 13
Location:
|
La_Sin_Grail wrote: You asked if switching out moldervine cloak for warhammer is a good idea against my deck.
Ah, no, I ddn’t. I said that warhammer made my deck better, and asked you to play test against it.
Quote: Now, think about it. My deck is based around removal, right? So you can make me kill something on demand with cloak- you can pick the target. If you use warhammer, you’ll be too slow. The other problem is if cloak resolves, I’m in a world of hurt. If the hammer equips, I’m more than happy to leave it alone until it becomes an issue. The toughness is what matters against a burn-based deck, and you won’t be getting any from hammer.
noted. lets put that theory to the test.
Quote: In general, moldervine cloak is incredible.
agreed, awesome card. tough d to leave it out.. |
|
|