Author |
Message |
Rate this article!
5 (Best) |
[ 0 ] 0% |
|
4 |
[ 1 ] 33% |
|
3 |
[ 2 ] 66% |
|
2 |
[ 0 ] 0% |
|
1 (Worst) |
[ 0 ] 0% |
|
Total Votes : 3 |
|
La_Sin_Grail |
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 3:26 pm |
|
|
Joined: 14 Aug 2005
Posts: 806
Location: Maryland
|
I’ll agree with arashi, but patron tends to be a win more card usually, in my experience. I know he has snake offering, but it just usually won’t change the game.. Sosuke, sachi, and seshiro will be the ones to do that. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
syndrome |
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 9:02 pm |
|
|
Joined: 20 Jul 2005
Posts: 423
Location: A cold place.
|
I had some anti air in there before (hankyu’s) but in the end I realized I didn’t need flying protection, my deck usually can cause more damage (by having more creatures) per turn than my opponent with his flying creatures.
’Sides, if they ever leave a guy untapped (like the first turn it’s played) you can just use a sniper + sosuke to kill it.
I’ve thought about the patron before, and am still deciding whether to purchase a copy. The problem is I’ve been spending way to much on TCGs when I should be saving more for my car :S |
http://myspace/delicatesituation |
|
Back to top |
|
La_Sin_Grail |
Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 6:12 pm |
|
|
Joined: 14 Aug 2005
Posts: 806
Location: Maryland
|
Your deck can’t top white weenie, though. If they drop a 1/1 flyer first turn, a 2/2 flyer second, and anthem turn three, you really just can’t contend with that. Add in a jitte etc., and that really hurts. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
inresponse |
Posted: Tue Mar 07, 2006 6:13 pm |
|
|
Joined: 18 Oct 2005
Posts: 162
Location:
|
this article was well written to describe the deck, but it did only that. When writing about a casual deck, I feel there needs to be a lot more than just a deck, especially since I would never consider playing almost any of the cards in this deck. A casual article, I think, needs to incorporate something interesting besides a decklist that beats your friends at the local shop. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
La_Sin_Grail |
Posted: Tue Mar 07, 2006 8:10 pm |
|
|
Joined: 14 Aug 2005
Posts: 806
Location: Maryland
|
inresponse wrote: this article was well written to describe the deck, but it did only that. When writing about a casual deck, I feel there needs to be a lot more than just a deck, especially since I would never consider playing almost any of the cards in this deck. A casual article, I think, needs to incorporate something interesting besides a decklist that beats your friends at the local shop.
What do you suggest? I tend to just make decks so completely out of the ordinary that people are too busy being shocked and arguing about it that they never notice , but I could make worse but more funny decks if I knew what to add. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
inresponse |
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 1:36 pm |
|
|
Joined: 18 Oct 2005
Posts: 162
Location:
|
hmmm....
not sure. maybe like interesting anecdotes or something? I have no desire to give this article a good rating because the deck has no real game against anything, but all it says is how good individual cards in the deck are. I guess the claim that joyous respite was a good card was funny though. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|