Author |
Message |
CarpeGuitarrem |
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 10:22 am |
|
|
Joined: 07 Apr 2006
Posts: 3361
Location: Franciscan University of Steubenville
|
Now, just a second here...I thought that the RB counted towards the Twilight cost of the SF, since Frodo is always . But now I read the Boromir, BoC, and the starting fellowship for that deck seems to count only the non-RB characters towards the twilight cost...
So do only the non-RB characters count towards twilight cost?? |
|
|
Back to top |
|
AnxiousChieftain |
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 10:29 am |
|
|
Joined: 15 Jul 2005
Posts: 3947
Location: Maryland
|
Yes. The Ring-bearer’s twilight cost is 0. It makes alternate Ring-bearers very good. |
MODS RULE. - lem0nhead |
|
Back to top |
|
bobtheorc |
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 12:28 pm |
|
|
Joined: 19 Mar 2006
Posts: 1218
Location: Wow, its hot in Iowa
|
I was wondering where is that rule listed?
I know its right but I can’t find it in the comprehinsive rule book or in the currrent rulings document.
And yes ARBs are the best thing since sliced bread.
They just open up so many oppertunities.
BTW I wrote an article on them, maybe you would like to check it out CarpeGuitarrem. |
Ban the Overpowered Orcs
"Don't panic, I have paper!" - Taipan
Is that Grima, Grief Counselor? - legolamb
Bobtheorcs Uruk-Hai Dcs
Bob’s wonderful !! updated !! Trade list |
|
Back to top |
|
bibfortuna25 |
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 2:17 pm |
|
|
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Posts: 615
Location: Springfield, OR
|
It doesn’t need to be in the rules that the RB’s twilight cost is 0. First of all, the RB isn’t even played at the start of the game; he starts the game in play, and you don’t pay costs for cards that you don’t play. Second of all, the rules state that after you’ve placed your RB in play, added the burdens and played the first site, then you get 4 twilight for additional companions. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
CarpeGuitarrem |
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 4:54 pm |
|
|
Joined: 07 Apr 2006
Posts: 3361
Location: Franciscan University of Steubenville
|
Yes, that makes sense now. Why was Frodo always Twilight cost 0 then? |
|
|
Back to top |
|
bibfortuna25 |
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 4:57 pm |
|
|
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Posts: 615
Location: Springfield, OR
|
To reduce confusion, and because you could never play him as a regular cmopanion. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
sickofpalantirs |
Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 7:39 am |
|
|
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 7750
Location: somwhere, over the rainbow way up high. There's a land that I heard of once in a lullaby.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|