Well, over at CC I remember a ruling that
Incited HAD to trigger before
YaLaaT, coming from the conclusion that "Each time" triggers before "Response." No, I don't remember the reasoning BEHIND "each time" triggering before "response," but one OUGHT to come definitely before the other, don't you think?
I *think* the logic would go something like this:
An "each time" action triggers every time you win a skirmish, and gives you a choice whether or not to perform said action "each time something happens, you may do something to do something else." It triggers every time, but gives you a choice, so I'd suppose that it'd be the first thing to happen once a skirmish is resolved, and "won," because it happens without the player telling it to, then you make your choice, eh?
Then I'd assume that response actions, which do not automatically trigger but are responses (obviously) performed by the player, would activate after "each time" actions. Seem plausible?
All I know is it's straight not right to play
YaLaaT and take it back AND THEN have the opportunity to play it again.
Also, I think (I could be as woefully incorrect as the above statement probably is) that you cannot use
Promise Keeping when you wound a companion with
YaLaaT, under the assumption that once you've "won" the skirmish, it's already over and outside of the skirmish phase.
Although I do think it triggers with threat wounds (and obviously with companions taking wounds) because a skirmish is not technically over until wounds have been taken, companions placed in the dead pile, etc.
No I'm not making this up. I swear I read it over at CC at one point or another...