Post your Gemp-LotR bugs here

[MarcinS]

Hello,

The case was:

Build the deck.

Click Save.

Doesn't show up.


2 or 3 hours later. Shows up.


So the decks were saved apparently. But they didn't show on the deck stack. This leads me to the following questions:

How do you update your deck library ? Are you doing it thru JSON? How are you saving the decks to the database? If you have a buffer that writes after a specific  amount of time, that would justify this case because i looked for the deck right after saving it, otherwise i don't understand.

There is also another possibility, which would depend on the database engine you are using.

On my side, i could help you solve the issue even code-wise. But i would have to understand how you are doing it.

PS: Congratulations on the software. I really like it.

Ok, found the problem. When a deck was saved, the cache with a list of deck names for player was not purged, therefore the new deck was not displaying. Once the cache has expired and was reloaded on next login, the deck was there.

This will be fixed after next restart (at first opportunity).

[bibfortuna25]

Dunlending Warrior's assignment action can be activated even when there is no ally in play.

[MarcinS]

Dunlending Warrior's assignment action can be activated even when there is no ally in play.

Fixed (after restart):
- "Dunlending Warrior" cannot be activated now, if you can't spot a follower.

[joepoe]

Supper specific error we just found by accident.  When at Ford of Bruinen, you get your first nazgul at -5 as you should, then if you use Ulaire Nelya, Lieutenant of Morgul to replace your opponeients Ford of Bruinen with  your own Ford of Bruinen, you get to play another nazgual for -5.  Maybe it's supposed to be that way, just seems a little too good.

[MarcinS]

Supper specific error we just found by accident.  When at Ford of Bruinen, you get your first nazgul at -5 as you should, then if you use Ulaire Nelya, Lieutenant of Morgul to replace your opponeients Ford of Bruinen with  your own Ford of Bruinen, you get to play another nazgual for -5.  Maybe it's supposed to be that way, just seems a little too good.

It is indeed supposed to be this way, at least to my knowledge.

[joepoe]

Supper specific error we just found by accident.  When at Ford of Bruinen, you get your first nazgul at -5 as you should, then if you use Ulaire Nelya, Lieutenant of Morgul to replace your opponeients Ford of Bruinen with  your own Ford of Bruinen, you get to play another nazgual for -5.  Maybe it's supposed to be that way, just seems a little too good.

It is indeed supposed to be this way, at least to my knowledge.

Wow crazy.  I'll make note of that!

[Saurergio]

I would like to report the qu 8R105 card is not working.

[MarcinS]

I would like to report the qu 8R105 card is not working.

Which part of the card? What exactly happened?

[Tbiesty]

Supper specific error we just found by accident.  When at Ford of Bruinen, you get your first nazgul at -5 as you should, then if you use Ulaire Nelya, Lieutenant of Morgul to replace your opponeients Ford of Bruinen with your own Ford of Bruinen, you get to play another nazgual for -5.  Maybe it's supposed to be that way, just seems a little too good.

It is indeed supposed to be this way, at least to my knowledge.

Even though both sites are different cards, since they do have the same card title and the game text refers to the card title I would lean towards it not reducing the twilight again.  Also, in my opinion that is the intended behavior and is more balanced.

[Hobbiton Lad]

I think in this case, because Ford of Bruinen is specifically referenced in the gametext, the twilight reduction wouldn't apply when the site is replaced. If the text of the site said, "The twilight cost of the first Nazgul played at this site is -5" then I think replacing the site with Nelya and getting the cost reduction would be proper. But in this case, I'm inclined to agree that the -5 should only happen once.

[bibfortuna25]

Tbiesty and Hobbiton Lad are correct.

[hsiale]

I don't think so.

Cards don't remember what cards they replaced. When deciding what effects apply, you look only at the current table situation. So the second Ford of Bruinen doesn't know if the site it replaced was Ford or something else.

Each time an effect should last longer than the presence of the card, it is either somehow noted (usually by placing some kind of token or by moving a card from one place to another) or explicitly stated at a card that it has effects lasting longer than the card is in play (for example High Vantage). For sites there is no tracking built into the game, once you replace a site, the old one is completely forgotten and the new has a fresh start, no matter if the replaced site was the same or another one.

[Hobbiton Lad]

For sites there is no tracking built into the game, once you replace a site, the old one is completely forgotten and the new has a fresh start, no matter if the replaced site was the same or another one.

While this is normally true, Ford of Bruinen does two special things:

1) Checks if the first Nazgul has been played;
2) If so, then checks whether or not that Nazgul has been played at Ford of Bruinen

Because it specifically states Ford of Bruinen in the gametext, I would rule that the site does indeed check for not only itself, but any other sites named Ford of Bruinen that may have been in play that turn.

[Acarion]

Hi there

I found a card that the effect is incomplete.

Last Days (12u71)

When I discarto a minion, the effect is activated, but its says that the minion enters +2 strength, fierce cost by -2, -2 cost that is not being done, he is entering the normal cost Ccould verify this please?

Thank you

Acarion

[MarcinS]

Hi there

I found a card that the effect is incomplete.

Last Days (12u71)

When I discarto a minion, the effect is activated, but its says that the minion enters +2 strength, fierce cost by -2, -2 cost that is not being done, he is entering the normal cost Ccould verify this please?

It seems to be fine. Do you have a game replay link, so I could verify?