LotR TCG Wiki
→ Card Sets:
All
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
→ Forums:
TLHH
CC
Welcome, Guest
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Login
Register
Menu
Home
Help
Login
Register
The Last Homely House
/
Middle-Earth
/
Archives of Minas Tirith
/
well-traveled issue
« previous
next »
Print
Pages:
1
Go Down
Author
Topic: well-traveled issue (Read 2436 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
August 02, 2009, 04:32:58 AM
Read 2436 times
Gil-Estel
Information
King
Posts:
2267
Abuser of the Force
well-traveled issue
«
on:
August 02, 2009, 04:32:58 AM »
The King and I played a game this morning, well actually we continued one. He was at site 2, I at site 3. I had played
Well-traveled
, so site 3 and 4 were mine. He also played
well-traveled
, and replaced mine, but is that legal? I mean, other cards read specifically 'replace the opponent's sites if necessary'. And since the fellowship's next sites are there already and he is replacing mine, I guess it is illegal. What say you?
Logged
..."Elves seldom give unguarded advice, for advice is a dangerous gift, even from the wise to the wise, and all courses may run ill"...
August 02, 2009, 05:05:17 AM
Reply #1
King89
Information
Horseman
Posts:
322
your master.
Re: well-traveled issue
«
Reply #1 on:
August 02, 2009, 05:05:17 AM »
i really want to know this as well!
Logged
german.
---
- German Lotr Tcg Board -
- My Trade&Sell List -
August 02, 2009, 06:33:43 AM
Reply #2
HawkeyeSPF
Information
Marksman
Posts:
639
Re: well-traveled issue
«
Reply #2 on:
August 02, 2009, 06:33:43 AM »
I can't find anything in terms of a text ruling, but I seem to remember that it plays the next two sites, replacing as necessary.
Logged
August 02, 2009, 06:54:07 AM
Reply #3
Gil-Estel
Information
King
Posts:
2267
Abuser of the Force
Re: well-traveled issue
«
Reply #3 on:
August 02, 2009, 06:54:07 AM »
yeah, I thought there was a clarification of some sort, but can't find it anywhere
Logged
..."Elves seldom give unguarded advice, for advice is a dangerous gift, even from the wise to the wise, and all courses may run ill"...
August 02, 2009, 01:57:13 PM
Reply #4
Elessar's Socks
Information
Knight
Posts:
1353
"I see...I look foul and feel foul. Is that it?"
Re: well-traveled issue
«
Reply #4 on:
August 02, 2009, 01:57:13 PM »
I think it's covered in the rulebook by: "Some cards allow a player to play the next site on the adventure path at times when the fellowship is not moving. These may be used even when the next site is already there."
So I'd look at
Well-traveled
as a case of clarifying text being omitted, instead of it being specially restricted.
Logged
August 02, 2009, 04:06:10 PM
Reply #5
jdizzy001
Information
Knight
Posts:
1038
Re: well-traveled issue
«
Reply #5 on:
August 02, 2009, 04:06:10 PM »
I think "replacing opponents' if necessary" became a redundant phrase they began to omit once the tcg grew in popularity. Otherwise the phrase would read, "replacing opponents' as necessary." Either that or "you cannot replace opponents site" as with
mount doom
«
Last Edit: August 02, 2009, 04:07:48 PM by jdizzy001
»
Logged
*All posts made by jdizzy001, regardless of the thread in which they appear, are expressions of his own opinion and as such are not representative of views shared by any third party unless expressly acknowledged as such by said party.
I play LOTR SBG look at my minis!
http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.124731667611081.33577.100002227457509&l=aeb5fa3bdd
Print
Pages:
1
Go Up
« previous
next »
The Last Homely House
/
Middle-Earth
/
Archives of Minas Tirith
/
well-traveled issue