LotR TCG Wiki → Card Sets:  All 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 → Forums:  TLHH CC

Author Topic: Bound to its Fate vs Erland, Adviser to Brand  (Read 4136 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

March 30, 2014, 10:08:10 AM
Read 4136 times

sgtdraino

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Knight
  • Posts: 1041
  • Ranger of Ecthelion
    • Facebook
Bound to its Fate vs Erland, Adviser to Brand
« on: March 30, 2014, 10:08:10 AM »
Wondering what happens when Bound to its Fate is played, and Erland, Advisor to Brand is in play. Does Bound to its Fate do nothing, because it cannot look at or reveal cards from hand? Or does it automatically add a burden, because there are no revealed cards?
"I would have followed you, my brother... my captain... my king." - Boromir

March 30, 2014, 11:04:02 AM
Reply #1

Legion

  • ****
  • Information Offline
  • Horseman
  • Posts: 343
Re: Bound to its Fate vs Erland, Adviser to Brand
« Reply #1 on: March 30, 2014, 11:04:02 AM »
It does nothing. You did not do the first part of the text, so no burden gets added. I use Erland in my Last Stand deck and I've seen this happen.

March 31, 2014, 03:06:58 AM
Reply #2

exarrkun

  • *
  • Information Offline
  • Goblin
  • Posts: 20
Re: Bound to its Fate vs Erland, Adviser to Brand
« Reply #2 on: March 31, 2014, 03:06:58 AM »
I think you can counter this by playing porter troll. The FP cannot reveal cards to you, even if they have events, so a burden would be added. Can anyone confirm this?

March 31, 2014, 05:13:25 AM
Reply #3

Haszor

  • ****
  • Information Offline
  • Villager
  • Posts: 287
Re: Bound to its Fate vs Erland, Adviser to Brand
« Reply #3 on: March 31, 2014, 05:13:25 AM »
I think you can counter this by playing porter troll. The FP cannot reveal cards to you, even if they have events, so a burden would be added. Can anyone confirm this?
Pretty sure they could still prevent the burden, as Erland says that the shadow player cannot reveal cards, and porter troll doesn't directly reveal the card, but rather gives the other player the option to reveal.

March 31, 2014, 09:08:38 AM
Reply #4

sgtdraino

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Knight
  • Posts: 1041
  • Ranger of Ecthelion
    • Facebook
Re: Bound to its Fate vs Erland, Adviser to Brand
« Reply #4 on: March 31, 2014, 09:08:38 AM »
Sounds like Erland's a pretty good counter to the various Orc corruption decks!
"I would have followed you, my brother... my captain... my king." - Boromir

April 01, 2014, 01:15:53 PM
Reply #5

Ringbearer

  • ****
  • Information Offline
  • Marksman
  • Posts: 709
Re: Bound to its Fate vs Erland, Adviser to Brand
« Reply #5 on: April 01, 2014, 01:15:53 PM »
I would look at it the other way. Since you cannot reveal the hand, the free peoples player cannot discard a revealed event and thus has to add a burden. You have to do as much as possible.

April 01, 2014, 11:44:24 PM
Reply #6

bibfortuna25

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Knight
  • Posts: 1531
Re: Bound to its Fate vs Erland, Adviser to Brand
« Reply #6 on: April 01, 2014, 11:44:24 PM »
Ringbearer's got it right. Since FP cannot discard an event with BTIF, a burden gets added. Porter Troll isn't a problem with Erland though, since FP is the one doing the revealing. Great question!
All cards do what they say, no more, no less.

April 02, 2014, 07:03:07 AM
Reply #7

sgtdraino

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Knight
  • Posts: 1041
  • Ranger of Ecthelion
    • Facebook
Re: Bound to its Fate vs Erland, Adviser to Brand
« Reply #7 on: April 02, 2014, 07:03:07 AM »
That is kind of what I suspected. I gather that Gemp currently doesn't do it that way?
"I would have followed you, my brother... my captain... my king." - Boromir

April 05, 2014, 03:12:00 AM
Reply #8

exarrkun

  • *
  • Information Offline
  • Goblin
  • Posts: 20
Re: Bound to its Fate vs Erland, Adviser to Brand
« Reply #8 on: April 05, 2014, 03:12:00 AM »
bibfortuna25, I follow the reasoning behind the porter troll, but erland also says a shadow player cannot look at cards in the FP player's hand.
So even when the FP player chooses to reveal an event from his/her hand, the shadow player may not look at it. Therefore the card isn't revealed to the shadow player.
Perhaps I'm misinterpreting the text, English is only my 3rd language...

April 05, 2014, 06:13:39 AM
Reply #9

bibfortuna25

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Knight
  • Posts: 1531
Re: Bound to its Fate vs Erland, Adviser to Brand
« Reply #9 on: April 05, 2014, 06:13:39 AM »
When the Shadow player plays BTIF with Erland in play, Erland prevents the FP's hand from being revealed. FP cannot discard an event, because no events were revealed. Therefore, a burden must be added.
All cards do what they say, no more, no less.