Not a bad shout at all. Would anyone else consider this? I would prefer not to do it as in my opinion the WK starter destroys all the other 5 from TTT Block, and Fellowship Block decks don't have the correct sites. If we gave free choice for the sites, then a
Cavern Entrance site 7 means the WK beats 10 of the others, with only Aragorn from Fellowship block having a chance if he plays
Pathfinder at the correct time. And then it's still not guaranteed. I'd rather not get into a 2 horse race of WK or Aragorn if there are 12 to choose from.
I do like the WotR block decks, but again the Boromir deck is really the one to play or to beat. If you go for 4 series like real leagues, then you just go Gandalf, Mouth of Sauron then Boromir 9 times out of 10, regardless of your booster pulls. If it was from any of the other 5, I guess Saruman, Gandalf and Mouth of Sauron are all viable. However as it was the most recent league, I would say let's not play it just yet.
If I had to vote now, I would say go for King Block. As they are the online version of the Eomer deck is far more powerful than the Aragorn. However that is purely down to the 2 Elite Riders killing all but 1 of the minions in the Aragorn deck. If they were removed from the deck (like with physical cards) I think the two are fairly balanced. As far as I remember, Pippin vs Merry is quite fun, too. I never got the
Mount Doom starters, so cannot say about Frodo vs Sam. (And yes I would consider saying reset the collection each week, as otherwise almost everyone would go Aragorn, Pippin then Sam).
I have written a programme that would give rankings in a way that should allow people to play each other more than once and it still being fair on the rest. It's based on the Rugby Union International Seedings, but uses Arctan instead of linear functions so you do gain (small) credit for beating someone much lower than you.
Has anyone else got any ideas? I certainly feel we could do something very new and inventive.