POLL: Players Committee. Let your opinion be heard.

[Elessar's Socks]

And it'd be bad if they're associated with the PC.

Bring on circles, squares, and triangles--small price to pay IMO for new cards.

[Jerba]

I'm sure we can get them really close, and looking good, without breaking the law. It won't be Kindergarten style. 

[Smeagollum]

I think not, because we're using their template, their idea, their system. But that is just my input....

Agreed, but maybe we have to offer them something as well! For instance we could promote fightclub for them. Or we could become one of the sellers for fightclub and instead of getting money we get the right to use their stuff.

Well we'll see in time. First things first and that's getting the pc on the road.

[Gil-Estel]

And what steps are you planning to take to achieve that? I mean, this poll can't last forever.

[jdizzy001]

NEW CARDS!

[MuadDib85]

1. b. It would be nice to have new stuff, but not necessary.
2. a. Bans
3. b. Important but I can deal with it.
4. depends on decision

[Kralik]

Just thought I'd step in as an admin and let you know that our official site policy is no graphical/virtual cards. I'd like to see this take off the ground as much as any of you, but it's on my head if Decipher/Tolkien gets upset... 

[Smeagollum]

Just thought I'd step in as an admin and let you know that our official site policy is no graphical/virtual cards. I'd like to see this take off the ground as much as any of you, but it's on my head if Decipher/Tolkien gets upset... 

That's also why I want you in the pc! Unfortunately you haven't anwsered my pm.
We surely don't want to get things on your head. But as mentioned first we've got to get the pc started and when everything is settled then we gonna need to make a plan towards Decipher, New Line and the heirs of Tolkien.
I'm sure we have to offer them something as well in exchange for some support (allowing us, till some degree, do make v-cards or such). But therefore we need you in the pc!

[Legosmurf]

Legally speaking, the card name and lore of existing cards needs to remain the same if we change tem. That way we're not making new cards but clarifying existing cards to be used in current gameplay.

Making completely new cards is a lot more complicated because then we're going to use their templates even if we use our own images.

But to start with creating virtual versions of now out of play cards is a good start to revitalize the game. Imho it has the following advantages:
1) Old cards are still available to the players who left after Mount Doom so altering them to the new gameplay might draw them back in.
2) Virtual cards can be done without artwork. Just the new gametekst in a corresponding template of the lower half of the card. Leave lore, name etc in tact to avoid problems with the big D.
3) Can also be used effectively to create erratas for broken cards that are in current play.

I suggest that we do this first and wait with the creating completely new cards. This btw doesn't mean that we can't introduce new game mechanics as long as we use new card texts on existing cards.

[Jerba]

Legally speaking, the card name and lore of existing cards needs to remain the same if we change tem. That way we're not making new cards but clarifying existing cards to be used in current gameplay.

Making completely new cards is a lot more complicated because then we're going to use their templates even if we use our own images.

But to start with creating virtual versions of now out of play cards is a good start to revitalize the game. Imho it has the following advantages:
1) Old cards are still available to the players who left after Mount Doom so altering them to the new gameplay might draw them back in.
2) Virtual cards can be done without artwork. Just the new gametekst in a corresponding template of the lower half of the card. Leave lore, name etc in tact to avoid problems with the big D.
3) Can also be used effectively to create erratas for broken cards that are in current play.

I suggest that we do this first and wait with the creating completely new cards. This btw doesn't mean that we can't introduce new game mechanics as long as we use new card texts on existing cards.

This makes sense. I concur. I wouldn't mind changing subtitles but we have to start somewhere!

[Smeagollum]

Legally speaking, the card name and lore of existing cards needs to remain the same if we change tem. That way we're not making new cards but clarifying existing cards to be used in current gameplay.

Making completely new cards is a lot more complicated because then we're going to use their templates even if we use our own images.

But to start with creating virtual versions of now out of play cards is a good start to revitalize the game. Imho it has the following advantages:
1) Old cards are still available to the players who left after Mount Doom so altering them to the new gameplay might draw them back in.
2) Virtual cards can be done without artwork. Just the new gametekst in a corresponding template of the lower half of the card. Leave lore, name etc in tact to avoid problems with the big D.
3) Can also be used effectively to create erratas for broken cards that are in current play.

I suggest that we do this first and wait with the creating completely new cards. This btw doesn't mean that we can't introduce new game mechanics as long as we use new card texts on existing cards.

Please read my question in the other topic!

[Legosmurf]

I answered you question in the other topic in english so nobody feels left out ;-p