one of the major concerns people have about the whole issue is the legality of forcing someone to buy anything. This bill forces, and i mean that in every sense of the word, to buy insurance. Not only insurance but a certain amount of insurance, costing an individual around 7500 u.s. dollars a year. (personally, that is 1/2 my yearly income. i'm a college student.) Secondly, the amount of insurance the individual shall buy covers things such as ambulance rides, maternity, prescriptions, rehabilitation, substance abuse, and a few other things i can't recall at the moment. This all sounds good, but what if I don't need substance abuse insurance because i don't drink? What if i was a woman who couldn't nor didn't want to have children? it wouldn't matter. the language of the bill is such that the individual has no choice and shall buy a minimum amount of insurance. It raises the question, is it morally right to obligate an individual to purchase something even if they don't need/want it.