0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
So I think the consensus is that legendary cards should follow the normal uniqueness rule for the dead pile. And it shall be so.I told you I'd be using the adventure decks in ways never before done. How about this guy (I apologise for the lack of a spread of cultures, but I was using and a bit of for my test cases): •Haldir, Guardian of Lothlórien Companion • ElfStr: 7Vit: 3Res: 6Archer. Ranger. Valiant.At the start of each turn, you must reveal a forest site from your adventure deck or discard Haldir.U
Nice idea Thranduil. It's good but balanced when compared to the other Haldir and to Glorfindel.
Haldir, Emissary of the Galadhrim is strength 7 85% of the time and has a regroup ability. He comes from TT block where cards are weaker than everything that is post-shadows. This card looks alright to me but I have to agree with lemonhead that when played with forest guls and their 9 forest sites, it is a bit lame.
I disagree that he is balanced. All that for 2 offset by loading your siteline with forests??? In whats going to be an elven deck surely? Elves loves forests!?!? There is no drawback, this is a tad OP! I would just about accept him if he was rare as he would be one awesome starting character. Its not like youre even going to necessarily run out of them because either a.) going first or b.) you're going second and have 9 forests anyway cos youre running elves/forestguls.
I don't think he's OP...Just make him Rare, and it'll be alright. On the other hand, I'm curious what adventage for him being a Valiant is. So far the only cards that are exploiting the Valiant keyword are Rohan cards, and even those don't involve spotting Valiant companions or elves, but Valiant men. It'd be rly interesting if u changed that and add some more elf-rohan colaboration.