LotR TCG Wiki → Card Sets:  All 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 → Forums:  TLHH CC
Menu
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Weird theoretical question  (Read 9873 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

August 14, 2010, 02:45:57 PM
Reply #15

MR. Lurtzy

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Posts: 2745
  • Wouldn't it be nice if we were Hodor?
    • My website
Re: Weird theoretical question
« Reply #15 on: August 14, 2010, 02:45:57 PM »
Quote from: ket_the_jet on August 14, 2010, 07:43:31 AM
Why don't you make your dream card closer to the Phial of Galadriel, Star-Glass and just make it a transferrable condition that makes a minion lose gametext?
-wtk

Well, my goal is more along the lines of the card being "hidden" so to speak for a phase from all players. I guess preventing the card from being spotted, or the target of any abilities would be better?
Logged
August 16, 2010, 02:17:53 AM
Reply #16

Kev-La

  • **
  • Information Offline
  • Scout
  • Posts: 95
  • Ah... the finest weed in the Southfarthing!
    • My MySpace Space
Re: Weird theoretical question
« Reply #16 on: August 16, 2010, 02:17:53 AM »
Quote from: MR. Lurtzy on August 14, 2010, 02:45:57 PM
Well, my goal is more along the lines of the card being "hidden" so to speak for a phase from all players. I guess preventing the card from being spotted, or the target of any abilities would be better?
To meet that goal in its most literal sense, I would suggest "Phase:[/b]b]Phase:[/b [Cost] to make this card inactive until the end of this phase."
Logged
Where I come from, one has to first give respect in order to earn it.
August 16, 2010, 03:19:05 AM
Reply #17

ket_the_jet

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 2062
  • He/Him/His
Re: Weird theoretical question
« Reply #17 on: August 16, 2010, 03:19:05 AM »
The problem is that "inactivity" has not been defined in this card game. In a game that requires the most detail in its cards as possible, this would just create another Galadriel, Lady of Light situation. What is "playing for free?"

I think the best way to do it is to have a card unable to use abilities or be targeted by events or abilities. Does that not accomplish what you wish, Lurtzy?
-wtk
Logged
August 16, 2010, 07:13:54 PM
Reply #18

MR. Lurtzy

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Posts: 2745
  • Wouldn't it be nice if we were Hodor?
    • My website
Re: Weird theoretical question
« Reply #18 on: August 16, 2010, 07:13:54 PM »
Well... I don't want to create a new keyword, but that may be necessary with the complexity of this situation. Thanks guys. :gp:
Logged
August 28, 2010, 06:13:31 PM
Reply #19

Kev-La

  • **
  • Information Offline
  • Scout
  • Posts: 95
  • Ah... the finest weed in the Southfarthing!
    • My MySpace Space
Re: Weird theoretical question
« Reply #19 on: August 28, 2010, 06:13:31 PM »
Quote from: MR. Lurtzy on August 16, 2010, 07:13:54 PM
... I don't want to create a new keyword...
Hmm, how about using "not active" in some way, then. Surely, if "active" is described in the rules, "not active" would be OK...?
Logged
Where I come from, one has to first give respect in order to earn it.
August 28, 2010, 09:59:24 PM
Reply #20

MR. Lurtzy

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Posts: 2745
  • Wouldn't it be nice if we were Hodor?
    • My website
Re: Weird theoretical question
« Reply #20 on: August 28, 2010, 09:59:24 PM »
It's kind of a moot point, as I've already made a new keyward for it, to lessen clutter and confusion.

Perhaps you will hear more about that later. :whistle:
« Last Edit: August 28, 2010, 10:07:20 PM by MR. Lurtzy »
Logged
September 03, 2010, 12:09:33 AM
Reply #21

Kev-La

  • **
  • Information Offline
  • Scout
  • Posts: 95
  • Ah... the finest weed in the Southfarthing!
    • My MySpace Space
Re: Weird theoretical question
« Reply #21 on: September 03, 2010, 12:09:33 AM »
Quote from: MR. Lurtzy on August 28, 2010, 09:59:24 PM
...I've already made a new keyward for it, to lessen clutter and confusion...

1R199
I'm imagining a furious sweeping and tidying down the halls of fallen Khazad-dum...
:twisted:
Logged
Where I come from, one has to first give respect in order to earn it.
September 03, 2010, 05:24:22 PM
Reply #22

MR. Lurtzy

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Posts: 2745
  • Wouldn't it be nice if we were Hodor?
    • My website
Re: Weird theoretical question
« Reply #22 on: September 03, 2010, 05:24:22 PM »
Quote from: Kev-La on September 03, 2010, 12:09:33 AM
1R199

Bit of a side note, but that's got to be one of the worst lores I've ever read. What makes it even worse is that it's in the first set.
Logged
September 04, 2010, 12:45:26 AM
Reply #23

Kev-La

  • **
  • Information Offline
  • Scout
  • Posts: 95
  • Ah... the finest weed in the Southfarthing!
    • My MySpace Space
Re: Weird theoretical question
« Reply #23 on: September 04, 2010, 12:45:26 AM »
Quote from: MR. Lurtzy on September 03, 2010, 05:24:22 PM
Bit of a side note, but that's got to be one of the worst lores I've ever read. What makes it even worse is that it's in the first set.
Yeah, crappy Decipher-made lore has always been a pet hate of mine, and this is a prime example.
Logged
Where I come from, one has to first give respect in order to earn it.
Pages: 1 2  All   Go Up
« previous next »