Walking on eggshells...
I think that
a) The focus should be on creating new formats or new sets that are optional and do not interfere with old sets, but
b) Regardless of the choices made, there will always be people who don't like them.
So let's focus on the positive for the time being. I do not think that banning cards or adding errata would be a good start, unless the GCCG community
knows fairly unanimously that a card
needs work. One example I could give is
Lady Redeemed -- even though she is NOT X-ed in Movie, there is an implicit agreement among GCCG players not to use/abuse her (in fact, she is also on the French X-list). In a case where the agreement is obvious, it could be "finalized." But that should only be done with great care.
Or on the positive side: I like using
Frodo, Mr. Underhill (P) because I think it is the best Frodo picture. I don't think it's going to bother any players if we started a poll to see if we could
add him as legal to any format that supports
Reluctant Adventurer.
If a select committee makes all the decisions, players are going to be angry that they didn't have a full say.
If the whole
community makes the decisions, players get to have their say. However, if we only make decisions when there is unanimous agreement, we will never get anywhere.
There should probably be a threshold for a percentage of players agreeing to any change before it is implemented. Perhaps something like 75%-80%.