LotR TCG Wiki → Card Sets:  All 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 → Forums:  TLHH CC

Author Topic: Preliminary Discussion: Mr. Underhill  (Read 7262 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

February 04, 2011, 07:10:21 AM
Read 7262 times

Kralik

  • Guest
Preliminary Discussion: Mr. Underhill
« on: February 04, 2011, 07:10:21 AM »
There are a subset of promos that are not legal in any format. Rather than tackle the whole subset, I'd like to look particularly at Frodo, Mr. Underhill. He has the same game text as Reluctant Adventurer, but the Gandy signet (which is very useful). Would it be acceptable to allow Mr. Underhill in any format that allows Reluctant Adventurer? Let's discuss and then vote.

February 04, 2011, 07:20:54 AM
Reply #1

hrcho

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Marksman
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 588
  • One does not simply Rock into Mordor.
    • My trade list
Re: Preliminary Discussion: Mr. Underhill
« Reply #1 on: February 04, 2011, 07:20:54 AM »
Would it be acceptable to allow Mr. Underhill in any format that allows Reluctant Adventurer?

My vote: Yes.
Some days you're the statue, and some days you're the pigeon.

Trade List (TLHH)
Trade List (Mahasamatman)

February 04, 2011, 07:30:19 AM
Reply #2

Tbiesty

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Marksman
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 561
Re: Preliminary Discussion: Mr. Underhill
« Reply #2 on: February 04, 2011, 07:30:19 AM »
Yes.  In fact, in general I think the promos that mirror non-promos should be allowed.

February 04, 2011, 07:42:41 AM
Reply #3

Kralik

  • Guest
Re: Preliminary Discussion: Mr. Underhill
« Reply #3 on: February 04, 2011, 07:42:41 AM »
Can anyone think of reasons not to allow Mr. Underhill? Let's go for some discussion before a vote.

One reason is, of course, the signet. Gandalf is arguably more powerful/useful than the Aragorn signet.

February 04, 2011, 08:13:50 AM
Reply #4

Thranduil

  • *******
  • Information Offline
  • Wizard
  • Posts: 4996
    • Zalman's Dungeon (blog of SF stories by Thranduil)
Re: Preliminary Discussion: Mr. Underhill
« Reply #4 on: February 04, 2011, 08:13:50 AM »
Can anyone think of reasons not to allow Mr. Underhill? Let's go for some discussion before a vote.
It is confusing to have 2 Frodo's with identical texts, but a different signet. And it's weird.

I obviously have no problem with people playing Mr. Underhill, but I wonder how much the confusion factor should be present in our deliberations... 8-)

[ASIDE: A great solution from my dream team hat would be to make a (V) version of Mr. Underhill which would be different and legal, and keep the original card illegal].

Thranduil

February 04, 2011, 08:40:15 AM
Reply #5

ununtrium

  • ****
  • Information Offline
  • Horseman
  • Posts: 307
Re: Preliminary Discussion: Mr. Underhill
« Reply #5 on: February 04, 2011, 08:40:15 AM »
I'd say: Yes, because of Mr. Underhill's similarity to RE. It would give a boost to signet strategies and this is always worth a shot.

And we always have Thranduil's dream team hat, if MU turns out to be overpowered...
I am a Lieutenant Commander on the G.A.B. Saffron team. My trade lists:
http://lotrtcgdb.com/forums/index.php/topic,3255.0.html
http://www.tradecardsonline.com/user/ununtrium

February 04, 2011, 09:25:01 AM
Reply #6

Kralik

  • Guest
Re: Preliminary Discussion: Mr. Underhill
« Reply #6 on: February 04, 2011, 09:25:01 AM »
Thran, why would anyone really be all that confused regarding two cards with the same gametext? There are separate images for each in GCCG, so I don't see it as all that different as having, say, Hobbit Sword*** vs. Hobbit Sword**.

February 04, 2011, 09:39:38 AM
Reply #7

legolas3333

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Posts: 2152
Re: Preliminary Discussion: Mr. Underhill
« Reply #7 on: February 04, 2011, 09:39:38 AM »
NOOOOOOOOOOOOO people, kralik obviously has some crazy deck up his sleeve that uses Mr. Underhill!!! I mean, look what he did with legal cards!!! *cough*Durin'sSecretSocietyOfDearFriends*cough* You can't give into his pressure!!!!!

However, I have no problem with anyone else playing with Mr. Underhill ;)
A Promo Saved is a Promo Earned

February 04, 2011, 09:41:00 AM
Reply #8

Kralik

  • Guest
Re: Preliminary Discussion: Mr. Underhill
« Reply #8 on: February 04, 2011, 09:41:00 AM »
Ack, L3333 knows my secrets!

February 04, 2011, 07:51:39 PM
Reply #9

MR. Lurtzy

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Posts: 2745
  • Wouldn't it be nice if we were Hodor?
    • My website
Re: Preliminary Discussion: Mr. Underhill
« Reply #9 on: February 04, 2011, 07:51:39 PM »
It's one of my favorite frodo pics and definately deserves to be used. Yes.

February 04, 2011, 09:00:59 PM
Reply #10

jdizzy001

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Knight
  • Posts: 1038
Re: Preliminary Discussion: Mr. Underhill
« Reply #10 on: February 04, 2011, 09:00:59 PM »
yes, if my vote matters.
*All posts made by jdizzy001, regardless of the thread in which they appear, are expressions of his own opinion and as such are not representative of views shared by any third party unless expressly acknowledged as such by said party.

I play LOTR SBG look at my minis!
http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.124731667611081.33577.100002227457509&l=aeb5fa3bdd

February 04, 2011, 09:36:35 PM
Reply #11

Kralik

  • Guest
Re: Preliminary Discussion: Mr. Underhill
« Reply #11 on: February 04, 2011, 09:36:35 PM »
Before I open the vote... is there anything else that needs to be said?

February 04, 2011, 11:19:47 PM
Reply #12

Gil-Estel

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 2267
  • Abuser of the Force
Re: Preliminary Discussion: Mr. Underhill
« Reply #12 on: February 04, 2011, 11:19:47 PM »
No, just play that midget
..."Elves seldom give unguarded advice, for advice is a dangerous gift, even from the wise to the wise, and all courses may run ill"...

February 05, 2011, 08:44:09 AM
Reply #13

Witchkingx5

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Knight
  • Posts: 1160
Re: Preliminary Discussion: Mr. Underhill
« Reply #13 on: February 05, 2011, 08:44:09 AM »
Yes, it's nearly impossible to get one.

February 05, 2011, 09:18:13 AM
Reply #14

Kralik

  • Guest
Re: Preliminary Discussion: Mr. Underhill
« Reply #14 on: February 05, 2011, 09:18:13 AM »
* Kralik has a couple.

And for the record, I will never cheat at GCCG collecting. I paid dearly in promos for the first and got the second recently after a game. All of my decks are proxy-free.