LotR TCG Wiki → Card Sets:  All 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 → Forums:  TLHH CC

Author Topic: Input Needed: The Fellowship of the Pipeweed / Saruman & Friends  (Read 10752 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


August 17, 2012, 09:13:08 PM
Reply #1

sgtdraino

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Knight
  • Posts: 1038
  • Ranger of Ecthelion
    • Facebook
Re: Input Needed: The Fellowship of the Pipeweed / Saruman & Friends
« Reply #1 on: August 17, 2012, 09:13:08 PM »
Not bad! I think you might have trouble getting your Gimli and your Boromir before you get the items you want to put on them, though. You might think about putting in more Gandalf's Carts.

Alternatively, I'd say start with a different version of Gandalf, and leave out Gimli and the Dwarf stuff altogether. Either put Gimli's pipe on an ally, or just don't use it. For your other companions just stick with Gondor and Shire, and pack in 4 Dagger Strikes to use in conjunction with your Servant of the Secret Fires, for some major multi-cultural power-ups. Might also think about Dear Friends to supplement your Fireworks for some major freeps Force-retrieval.
"I would have followed you, my brother... my captain... my king." - Boromir

August 18, 2012, 05:53:11 AM
Reply #2

Galdor420

  • **
  • Information Offline
  • Uruk-hai
  • Posts: 53
Re: Input Needed: The Fellowship of the Pipeweed / Saruman & Friends
« Reply #2 on: August 18, 2012, 05:53:11 AM »
Thanks for the comments! I also had the conern about gimli + boromir's items coming in before them, but thats why I use the site 1 that I do. It pulls candalf's cart from the draw deck so I can use that if I feel I'm getting cloged too much (havent play tested yet). Either way each of those 2 has 2 copies of themselves and only 3 additinal cards each to play on them so really they are not essential to the deck anyway.

Thing about Gimli's pipe is that it can only play on Gimli, so unless you know of a Gimli ally that I do not... lol, then I guess he has to be a companion. He makes Gandalf stronger anyway though so I dont mind him in the fellowship. The gandalf I chose will be base 9 strength with the other 2 companions out AND he has the frodo signant (important for frodo's pipe) so he's just the idea choice of Gandalf for the deck.

What do you think about the shadow?

August 18, 2012, 06:32:05 AM
Reply #3

Cw0rk

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Knight
  • Posts: 1378
  • .
Re: Input Needed: The Fellowship of the Pipeweed / Saruman & Friends
« Reply #3 on: August 18, 2012, 06:32:05 AM »
What kind of format is that? Your sitepath is weird.

August 18, 2012, 07:30:59 AM
Reply #4

sgtdraino

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Knight
  • Posts: 1038
  • Ranger of Ecthelion
    • Facebook
Re: Input Needed: The Fellowship of the Pipeweed / Saruman & Friends
« Reply #4 on: August 18, 2012, 07:30:59 AM »
What kind of format is that? Your sitepath is weird.

Oh yeah! It looks like he's got sites from at least three different blocks! That don't work, dude. It looks like you're either going to have to stick with Fellowship Block (if you want the Gandalf's Cart site), and take out your non-Fellowship block cards, or ditch the cart and go with a different format.
"I would have followed you, my brother... my captain... my king." - Boromir

August 18, 2012, 03:02:11 PM
Reply #5

Galdor420

  • **
  • Information Offline
  • Uruk-hai
  • Posts: 53
Re: Input Needed: The Fellowship of the Pipeweed / Saruman & Friends
« Reply #5 on: August 18, 2012, 03:02:11 PM »
The site 6 linked wrong but whatever. This is the movie block forum isnt it? That includes sets 1-10 right? All the sites i picked are within that range. I know tourniments back in the day only let u play sites from the latest block but that was just so they could sell more cards. Me and my friends play only movie block and there are no more tourniments so all set 1-10 sites are fine with any1 i play with.

August 18, 2012, 03:07:45 PM
Reply #6

Galdor420

  • **
  • Information Offline
  • Uruk-hai
  • Posts: 53
Re: Input Needed: The Fellowship of the Pipeweed / Saruman & Friends
« Reply #6 on: August 18, 2012, 03:07:45 PM »
We also dont care about x-list cards if u didnt notice since, again, that only applies to tourniments which dont exsist anymore.

August 18, 2012, 04:14:11 PM
Reply #7

sgtdraino

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Knight
  • Posts: 1038
  • Ranger of Ecthelion
    • Facebook
Re: Input Needed: The Fellowship of the Pipeweed / Saruman & Friends
« Reply #7 on: August 18, 2012, 04:14:11 PM »
Unless I'm mistaken, Movie Block uses King sites.
"I would have followed you, my brother... my captain... my king." - Boromir

August 20, 2012, 08:09:59 AM
Reply #8

Galdor420

  • **
  • Information Offline
  • Uruk-hai
  • Posts: 53
Re: Input Needed: The Fellowship of the Pipeweed / Saruman & Friends
« Reply #8 on: August 20, 2012, 08:09:59 AM »
Officially you are probably correct, but then we would never ever play with any of the sites from fellowship or tower block which seems silly to me since they are all part of movie block. I guess we will chalk that up to a house rule but it doesnt really matter anyway since you could use whatever sites you want for the deck. They dont matter that much and I'd rather the discussion focus on the deck itself rather than the sites which dont really matter anyway.

Anyway I got to play test the deck twice on the weekend and you were right about getting clogged with the dwarven and gondor cards before I got their respective companions. I'll have to rework the deck a bit in order to make sure that doesnt happen in the future. As for the shadow side I was pleasently surprised at the amazing effectiveness of Saruman, Servant of the Eye with Saruman's Staff, Wizard's Device! That combo single handedly killed a fresh aragorn and gimli ringbearer by delivering a whaping 7 wounds (9 if u count the 2 threats he had to distribute)! Amazing for 6 cost! :D

August 20, 2012, 10:25:27 AM
Reply #9

Zurcamos

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Tracker
  • Global Mod
  • Posts: 124
Re: Input Needed: The Fellowship of the Pipeweed / Saruman & Friends
« Reply #9 on: August 20, 2012, 10:25:27 AM »
If rules are only for tournaments, you might as well just have Boromir and Gimli in your starting fellowship with Gandalf, and Arwen, Maiden of Rivendell as your ringbearer.  For your shadow, use nothing but The Balrog, Durin's Bane (play as many copies as you want each turn), except for a single copy of the MTG card "Akroma, Angel of Wrath."   Keep Shire Lookout Point, but use The Bridge of Khazad-dum for sites 2-9.  Better yet, if sites "don't matter that much," use a Batman action figure instead.  Be aware, however, that the rulebook does have one rule that absolutely no house rule can ignore: if anyone uses a Christian Bale Batman voice in conjunction with their action figure, they instantly lose the game - and Zurcamos gets to keep their action figure (no, it's not the official rulebook, but who cares about that?).

:uh-huh:

August 20, 2012, 01:32:22 PM
Reply #10

Galdor420

  • **
  • Information Offline
  • Uruk-hai
  • Posts: 53
Re: Input Needed: The Fellowship of the Pipeweed / Saruman & Friends
« Reply #10 on: August 20, 2012, 01:32:22 PM »
If rules are only for tournaments

Thats a far cry from "We also dont care about x-list cards if u didnt notice since, again, that only applies to tourniments which dont exsist anymore." Obviously I still play by the rules, more so than you do actually, if I don't use the x-list. What I said is true:

"The following cards may not be played in Standard format tournaments for The Lord of the Rings™ TCG:" <-- in regard t the x-list

http://www.decipher-games.com/lotr/regeln/CRD-may04.pdf

2007 World Championship was the last offical tournament

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lord_of_the_Rings_Trading_Card_Game

Obviously your just a troll trying to cling to your precious x-list long after offical tournaments have ended, and if you and your group of friends want to pretend your still playing in tournaments that is your business. I am actually playing closer to the rules than you are if you are inforcing an x-list on your games because x-list clearly only applies to tournaments in standard format. When I say the "sites dont matter" thats exactly what I mean. Put this deck on a fully king-block site path and it will work pretty much the same. I'm not depending on some "prancing pony" to make my deck work...

August 20, 2012, 02:08:46 PM
Reply #11

Zurcamos

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Tracker
  • Global Mod
  • Posts: 124
Re: Input Needed: The Fellowship of the Pipeweed / Saruman & Friends
« Reply #11 on: August 20, 2012, 02:08:46 PM »
If rules are only for tournaments

Thats a far cry from "We also dont care about x-list cards if u didnt notice since, again, that only applies to tourniments which dont exsist anymore."
...
I am actually playing closer to the rules than you are if you are inforcing an x-list on your games because x-list clearly only applies to tournaments in standard format.

So, you have a problem with me saying you think rules are only for tournaments, then respond by saying rules are only for tournaments.  The X-list and King sites are rules in Movie Block, and you posted under Movie Block.  I follow all the rules; you don't, so your argument makes no sense.  Throwing sites from other blocks would make a MASSIVE difference.  If you disagree, you don't understand the game.  Period.

I'm not depending on some "prancing pony" to make my deck work...
thats why I use the site 1 that I do. It pulls candalf's cart from the draw deck so I can use that if I feel I'm getting cloged too much

No, you use a different site from the wrong set to make your deck work.  :roll:

I was just teasing you earlier.  I made no personal attacks.  You can do whatever you want with your cards (or Batman action figures), but don't smear your attitude on this site when you are the only person here who believes what you do.  Cw0rk and sgtdraino were correct in their comments.
« Last Edit: August 20, 2012, 02:31:10 PM by Zurcamos »

August 21, 2012, 06:24:10 AM
Reply #12

Galdor420

  • **
  • Information Offline
  • Uruk-hai
  • Posts: 53
Re: Input Needed: The Fellowship of the Pipeweed / Saruman & Friends
« Reply #12 on: August 21, 2012, 06:24:10 AM »
I have a problem with you implying that I'm saying rules are only for tournaments simply because you don't want to see the facts. I linked to wikipedia and offical decipher documents to illustrate you are wrong. You are citing a sticky forum post on a third party site that any dumbass with an internet connection could have wrote. If you somehow got that I don't follow rules because I don't run offical tourniments you need to go back to elementry school and learn to read before you make more posts insulting people based on your ignorance.

If you think that deck requires starting with gandalf's cart to make it work it is you who does not understand the game. Starting a king site one makes little difference in its effectiveness. You could take Gandalf's cart out of that deck completely and it wouldn't really make a big difference. The only thing you were right about in your post is that Cw0rk and sgtdraino were correct in their comments. You, on the other hand, were not. Is it not a personal attack to imply I'm some kind of idiot who doesn't know the rules with your sarcastic attitude? You are the one bringing attitude to my thread. Yea I use non-standard site paths. So what? Forget I posted a site path. I came here for critisim on the deck itself but all I got was a pointless disscussion about sites.

"The X-list and King sites are rules in Movie Block" <-- king sites yes, but show me an offical decipher document that states x-list is a rule in movie block outside of tourniments or kindly STFU.

August 21, 2012, 09:53:39 AM
Reply #13

Ringbearer

  • ****
  • Information Offline
  • Marksman
  • Posts: 709
Re: Input Needed: The Fellowship of the Pipeweed / Saruman & Friends
« Reply #13 on: August 21, 2012, 09:53:39 AM »
While I understand your point, keep in mind that most people here play with tournament rules, and as such might not be giving a good answer.

August 21, 2012, 11:01:24 AM
Reply #14

Zurcamos

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Tracker
  • Global Mod
  • Posts: 124
Re: Input Needed: The Fellowship of the Pipeweed / Saruman & Friends
« Reply #14 on: August 21, 2012, 11:01:24 AM »
Taken from LOTRO:

Quote
Movie Block
Movie Block format uses cards from sets 1-10 (all of the 'movie' blocks plus Reflections) and a King-block legal. You may not include cards from the Standard Exclusion List prior to the release of Shadows.

http://web.archive.org/web/20080907115104/http://lotronline.decipher.com/help/playformats.shtml

Simple concept, Galdor420: just because it was also official for tournaments does not mean it isn't official elsewhere too.  Once again, the X-list and King sites are rules in Movie Block, and you posted under Movie Block.  This means that if you play(ed) Movie Block anywhere except with your group of friends, you'd be playing it with King sites and X-list or you wouldn't be playing.  This means at events, online on the OFFICIAL DECIPHER LOTRO, here on this site, any of the online programs people here use, everywhere.  You can call me wrong all you want, you can call names and throw temper tantrums like a child because you "don't want to see the facts," but you'll continue to be wrong.  I have played this game in paper form since shortly after its release with people who knew how to play the game.  While I have rule questions and make mistakes too, this is not one of those situations.

The only thing you were right about in your post is that Cw0rk and sgtdraino were correct in their comments. You, on the other hand, were not.
And they agree with me.  So, if they are right, what does that make me?  What does that make you?

If you think that deck requires starting with gandalf's cart to make it work it is you who does not understand the game...
You have two copies of two companions in your deck.  You don't think sites matter.  Yes, *I* don't understand the game.   :roll:

I linked to wikipedia and offical decipher documents to illustrate you are wrong. You are citing a sticky forum post on a third party site that any dumbass with an internet connection could have wrote.
Anybody can change wikipedia, lol.  You just can't help yourself, can you?  Also, the post, which I don't think I actually cited before, was written by the owner of the site.  Go ahead and call him names and see what it gets you.

"The X-list and King sites are rules in Movie Block" <-- king sites yes, but show me an offical decipher document that states x-list is a rule in movie block outside of tourniments or kindly STFU.
Done.  See beginning of post.  Don't like what members of this site have to say?  Kindly GTFO.
« Last Edit: August 21, 2012, 11:17:42 AM by Zurcamos »