LotR TCG Wiki → Card Sets:  All 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 → Forums:  TLHH CC
Menu
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 ... 13  All   Go Down

Author Topic: LOTR Card Database/Autolinker Typos/Suggestions  (Read 44199 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

May 13, 2009, 07:13:39 PM
Reply #120

MR. Lurtzy

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Posts: 2745
  • Wouldn't it be nice if we were Hodor?
    • My website
Re: LOTR Card Database/Autolinker Typos/Suggestions
« Reply #120 on: May 13, 2009, 07:13:39 PM »
What of the promos I mentioned earlier?
Logged
May 22, 2009, 10:02:10 AM
Reply #121

MR. Lurtzy

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Posts: 2745
  • Wouldn't it be nice if we were Hodor?
    • My website
Re: LOTR Card Database/Autolinker Typos/Suggestions
« Reply #121 on: May 22, 2009, 10:02:10 AM »
1c92 doesn't link.

Edit: neither does 1u162.
« Last Edit: May 22, 2009, 10:08:11 AM by MR. Lurtzy »
Logged
May 22, 2009, 10:39:05 AM
Reply #122

Kralik

  • Guest
Re: LOTR Card Database/Autolinker Typos/Suggestions
« Reply #122 on: May 22, 2009, 10:39:05 AM »
1C92, 1U162.

Case sensitive. Probably so that worry and armor don't link in other contexts (vs. Worry and Armor).
Logged
May 22, 2009, 05:31:03 PM
Reply #123

MR. Lurtzy

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Posts: 2745
  • Wouldn't it be nice if we were Hodor?
    • My website
Re: LOTR Card Database/Autolinker Typos/Suggestions
« Reply #123 on: May 22, 2009, 05:31:03 PM »
well most others, like 1u159 1c160  1u97 1c104 1c107 all link that way.
Logged
May 22, 2009, 07:29:52 PM
Reply #124

Kralik

  • Guest
Re: LOTR Card Database/Autolinker Typos/Suggestions
« Reply #124 on: May 22, 2009, 07:29:52 PM »
As stated, it's because I put special code in to make those (and several other) card titles case insensitive. It affects the collector's information as well. Another example: Hate, hate, 1R250, 1r250.
« Last Edit: May 22, 2009, 07:31:39 PM by Kralik »
Logged
May 22, 2009, 08:16:24 PM
Reply #125

MuadDib85

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Ranger
  • Posts: 940
Re: LOTR Card Database/Autolinker Typos/Suggestions
« Reply #125 on: May 22, 2009, 08:16:24 PM »
I have noticed some RFs and Masterworks don't autolink,

eg. 18O9 Pull of The Ring (aswell as the rest of the T&D masterworks)

I don't think any of the RFs autolink.



Logged
May 22, 2009, 08:27:09 PM
Reply #126

Kralik

  • Guest
Re: LOTR Card Database/Autolinker Typos/Suggestions
« Reply #126 on: May 22, 2009, 08:27:09 PM »
Those are all cards that I added well after programming the autolink system. The data would have to be entered by hand and I just haven't gotten around to it.
Logged
May 22, 2009, 08:30:14 PM
Reply #127

Elessar's Socks

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Knight
  • Posts: 1353
  • "I see...I look foul and feel foul. Is that it?"
Re: LOTR Card Database/Autolinker Typos/Suggestions
« Reply #127 on: May 22, 2009, 08:30:14 PM »
Would it be worth noting which cards are online-only? AFD Faramir, Holiday Gandalf, SPDs, W's... not sure about a few D's.
Logged
May 22, 2009, 08:33:22 PM
Reply #128

Kralik

  • Guest
Re: LOTR Card Database/Autolinker Typos/Suggestions
« Reply #128 on: May 22, 2009, 08:33:22 PM »
All of the Triumph and Menace (D) series is online only, 0D1-0D8 (Bilbo) are real.
Logged
May 22, 2009, 08:55:01 PM
Reply #129

MuadDib85

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Ranger
  • Posts: 940
Re: LOTR Card Database/Autolinker Typos/Suggestions
« Reply #129 on: May 22, 2009, 08:55:01 PM »
Quote from: Kralik on May 22, 2009, 08:27:09 PM
Those are all cards that I added well after programming the autolink system. The data would have to be entered by hand and I just haven't gotten around to it.
If this could maybe be done one day it would be cool. :)
Logged
May 26, 2009, 12:17:14 PM
Reply #130

MR. Lurtzy

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Posts: 2745
  • Wouldn't it be nice if we were Hodor?
    • My website
Re: LOTR Card Database/Autolinker Typos/Suggestions
« Reply #130 on: May 26, 2009, 12:17:14 PM »
18R124 White Hand Attacker is listed as rare, when it is a common.
Logged
June 10, 2009, 04:31:49 AM
Reply #131

legolas3333

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Posts: 2152
Re: LOTR Card Database/Autolinker Typos/Suggestions
« Reply #131 on: June 10, 2009, 04:31:49 AM »
15R98 black gate sentry is actually uncommon
Logged
A Promo Saved is a Promo Earned
June 19, 2009, 02:48:56 AM
Reply #132

Elessar's Socks

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Knight
  • Posts: 1353
  • "I see...I look foul and feel foul. Is that it?"
Re: LOTR Card Database/Autolinker Typos/Suggestions
« Reply #132 on: June 19, 2009, 02:48:56 AM »
Wow, when did Nazgul shorthand like "Cantea FotNR" auto-link? (Or was it always like that. :lol:) Good stuff.
Logged
June 19, 2009, 04:15:36 PM
Reply #133

Kralik

  • Guest
Re: LOTR Card Database/Autolinker Typos/Suggestions
« Reply #133 on: June 19, 2009, 04:15:36 PM »
I went through a while back and added the options for it to work without Ulaire. Never really announced it. Enquea LoM FTW! ;)
Logged
June 23, 2009, 10:04:35 AM
Reply #134

Kralik

  • Guest
Re: LOTR Card Database/Autolinker Typos/Suggestions
« Reply #134 on: June 23, 2009, 10:04:35 AM »
Quote from: Kralik on April 16, 2009, 11:50:29 AM
Thanks for the feedback! I'll be fixing these shortly.

Translation: I'll be fixing these as soon as housing-related business calms down and I feel that it's more interesting than playing LotR itself. :lol:

...OK, OK, I admit it, I've been slacking. But as far as I know, all of the above fixes have now been made. Thanks! 8-)
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 ... 13  All   Go Up
« previous next »