LotR TCG Wiki → Card Sets:  All 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 → Forums:  TLHH CC

Author Topic: Birds  (Read 2582 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

February 16, 2009, 01:38:30 PM
Read 2582 times

Gate Troll

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Ranger
  • Posts: 971
Birds
« on: February 16, 2009, 01:38:30 PM »
What do you think?  :P

February 16, 2009, 01:44:49 PM
Reply #1

GarrisonofGondor

  • ****
  • Information Offline
  • Marksman
  • Posts: 622
  • Let the armies of Mordor know this....
Re: Birds
« Reply #1 on: February 16, 2009, 01:44:49 PM »
 Come on people, God created dinosaurs and all animals to reproduce after their own kind.
"Never Again, will the land of my people, fall into enemy hands! For Gondor! For Gondor! For Gondor!

https://lotrtcgwiki.com/forums/index.php?topic=426.120

February 16, 2009, 02:02:06 PM
Reply #2

Elrohir

  • ****
  • Information Offline
  • Marksman
  • Posts: 575
  • If you want him, come and claim him!
    • Elrohir wants some cards
Re: Birds
« Reply #2 on: February 16, 2009, 02:02:06 PM »
Sure, birds developed of dinosaurs. That does not mean, that animals, created by God, do not reproduce with their own kind. Just look at archeopterix...  :uh-huh:
You gave away your life's grace. I cannot protect you anymore.

February 16, 2009, 02:15:18 PM
Reply #3

Gate Troll

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Ranger
  • Posts: 971
Re: Birds
« Reply #3 on: February 16, 2009, 02:15:18 PM »
     In 1996, newspapers reported a find in China of a reptile fossil that supposedly had feathers. Some of the media reports claimed that, if it were confirmed, it would be "irrefutable evidence that today's birds evolved from dinosaurs." One scientist stated, "You can't come to any conclusion other than that they're feathers." However, in 1997 the Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia sent four leading scientists to investigate this find. They concluded that they were not feathers. The media report stated, concerning one of the scientists, "He said he saw ‘hair-like' structures—not hairs—that could have supported a frill, or crest, like those on iguanas."

     No sooner had this report appeared than another media report claimed that 20 fragments of bones of a reptile found in South America showed that dinosaurs were related to birds.

     Birds are warm-blooded and reptiles are cold-blooded, but evolutionists who believe dinosaurs evolved into birds would like to see dinosaurs as warm-blooded to support their theory. But Dr. Larry Martin, of the University of Kansas, opposes this idea:

    Recent research has shown the microscopic structure of dinosaur bones was "characteristic of cold-blooded animals," Martin said. "So we're back to cold-blooded dinosaurs."

     Several more recent reports have fueled the bird/dinosaur debate among evolutionists. One concerns research on the embryonic origins of the "fingers" of birds and dinosaurs, showing that birds could not have evolved from dinosaurs. A study of the so-called feathered dinosaur from China revealed that the dinosaur had a distinctively reptilian lung and diaphragm, which is distinctly different from the avian lung. Another report said that the frayed edges that some thought to be "feathers" on the Chinese fossil are similar to the collagen fibers found immediately beneath the skin of sea snakes.

     There is no credible evidence that dinosaurs evolved into birds. Dinosaurs have always been dinosaurs and birds have always been birds.

What if a dinosaur fossil was found with feathers on it? Would that prove that birds evolved from dinosaurs? No, a duck has a duck bill and webbed feet, as does a platypus, but nobody believes that this proves that platypuses evolved from ducks. The belief that reptiles or dinosarus evolved into birds requires reptilian scales on the way to becoming feathers, that is, transitional scales, not fully formed feathers.

February 16, 2009, 02:20:45 PM
Reply #4

King89

  • ****
  • Information Offline
  • Horseman
  • Posts: 322
  • your master.
    • nine-walkers 2.0 german
Re: Birds
« Reply #4 on: February 16, 2009, 02:20:45 PM »
i don't understand the question - what is it good for?

please don't open new topics all the day and using spamming [to get more posts] - rather get a "real life" young boy(S). ;)

edit: thank's @ lurtzy - but such topics are still useless :P
« Last Edit: February 16, 2009, 02:28:52 PM by King89 »

February 16, 2009, 02:25:52 PM
Reply #5

MR. Lurtzy

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Posts: 2745
  • Wouldn't it be nice if we were Hodor?
    • My website
Re: Birds
« Reply #5 on: February 16, 2009, 02:25:52 PM »
Posts in the Council of Cobra do not count towards your overall post count.

February 16, 2009, 02:41:36 PM
Reply #6

Gate Troll

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Ranger
  • Posts: 971
Re: Birds
« Reply #6 on: February 16, 2009, 02:41:36 PM »
i don't understand the question - what is it good for?

please don't open new topics all the day and using spamming [to get more posts] - rather get a "real life" young boy(S). ;)

edit: thank's @ lurtzy - but such topics are still useless :P

What a wonderful bouquet of red herrings and spam. What you have said is not the point. This is a valid argument, please don't try to discredit it by bringing a non-related factor (our ages) into the discussion. If you wish to discuss, disagree, or argue logically with us, by all means, do. If you wish to spam, and propagate red herrings I would request that you do it elsewhere. Thank you.

February 16, 2009, 02:43:28 PM
Reply #7

GarrisonofGondor

  • ****
  • Information Offline
  • Marksman
  • Posts: 622
  • Let the armies of Mordor know this....
Re: Birds
« Reply #7 on: February 16, 2009, 02:43:28 PM »
 Archaeopytrex was just a bird with claws. The only reason evolutionists believe it is a transitional fossil is because they are desprate. I just went over that fossil in biology.
"Never Again, will the land of my people, fall into enemy hands! For Gondor! For Gondor! For Gondor!

https://lotrtcgwiki.com/forums/index.php?topic=426.120

February 16, 2009, 03:57:23 PM
Reply #8

TheJord

  • League Director
  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Posts: 2294
  • High King of Rules
    • GamesCobra
Re: Birds
« Reply #8 on: February 16, 2009, 03:57:23 PM »
I thought this topic was about girls... nevermind

A British thing
"The rule of Gondor is mine!"

February 16, 2009, 07:37:25 PM
Reply #9

sickofpalantirs

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Useful Spammer
  • Posts: 8880
  • one spammer to rule them all
Re: Birds
« Reply #9 on: February 16, 2009, 07:37:25 PM »
I thought it was about the alfred hitchcock movie, which frankly, I think, would make for more interesting discussion.
Felipe Musco:
(after all, it's a CHARITY organization, I still have SOME principles, even having gone through Law School... :P),
Elf Lvr:
Bit of a scrawny Iowan kid with an unhealthy artifact obsession. Oh, and a God of Spam. In a good way.
Ahhh!!! SoP, you're a genius!!! :gp: ~Menace64
SoP's Trade List
Like Muscle Cars? Check out themusclecarplace.com

February 17, 2009, 12:55:33 AM
Reply #10

lem0nhead

  • Vegetarian Cannibal
  • *******
  • Information Offline
  • Wizard
  • Posts: 4205
  • Juicy Fruit
Re: Birds
« Reply #10 on: February 17, 2009, 12:55:33 AM »
I thought this topic was about girls... nevermind

A British thing

LOL @ Jordy. Mate, thats exactly what i thought before i even opened the post but i suspected probably otherwise!

Hehehe.
Ban shampoo, demand real poo.
That's like having "Some Who Ride Ponies" as a Rohan follower. ~ Dain Ironfoot.

February 17, 2009, 01:23:45 AM
Reply #11

Vroengard

  • ****
  • Information Offline
  • Bowman
  • Posts: 424
Re: Birds
« Reply #11 on: February 17, 2009, 01:23:45 AM »
     In 1996, newspapers reported a find in China of a reptile fossil that supposedly had feathers. Some of the media reports claimed that, if it were confirmed, it would be "irrefutable evidence that today's birds evolved from dinosaurs." One scientist stated, "You can't come to any conclusion other than that they're feathers." However, in 1997 the Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia sent four leading scientists to investigate this find. They concluded that they were not feathers. The media report stated, concerning one of the scientists, "He said he saw ‘hair-
like' structures—not hairs—that could have supported a frill, or crest, like those on iguanas."

This is a joke, right?? ....I do not think that this has something to do with serious science....just grab a biology book mate

     No sooner had this report appeared than another media report claimed that 20 fragments of bones of a reptile found in South America showed that dinosaurs were related to birds.

     Birds are warm-blooded and reptiles are cold-blooded, but evolutionists who believe dinosaurs evolved into birds would like to see dinosaurs as warm-blooded to support their theory. But Dr. Larry Martin, of the University of Kansas, opposes this idea:

    Recent research has shown the microscopic structure of dinosaur bones was "characteristic of cold-blooded animals," Martin said. "So we're back to cold-blooded dinosaurs."

     Several more recent reports have fueled the bird/dinosaur debate among evolutionists. One concerns research on the embryonic origins of the "fingers" of birds and dinosaurs, showing that birds could not have evolved from dinosaurs. A study of the so-called feathered dinosaur from China revealed that the dinosaur had a distinctively reptilian lung and diaphragm, which is distinctly different from the avian lung. Another report said that the frayed edges that some thought to be "feathers" on the Chinese fossil are similar to the collagen fibers found immediately beneath the skin of sea snakes.

     There is no credible evidence that dinosaurs evolved into birds. Dinosaurs have always been dinosaurs and birds have always been birds.

What if a dinosaur fossil was found with feathers on it? Would that prove that birds evolved from dinosaurs? No, a duck has a duck bill and webbed feet, as does a platypus, but nobody believes that this proves that platypuses evolved from ducks. The belief that reptiles or dinosarus evolved into birds requires reptilian scales on the way to becoming feathers, that is, transitional scales, not fully formed feathers.

February 17, 2009, 01:24:55 AM
Reply #12

Vroengard

  • ****
  • Information Offline
  • Bowman
  • Posts: 424
Re: Birds
« Reply #12 on: February 17, 2009, 01:24:55 AM »
you are joking, this can't be serious?? ....just grab a biology book. this has nothin' to do with real science

February 17, 2009, 02:12:17 AM
Reply #13

MR. Lurtzy

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Posts: 2745
  • Wouldn't it be nice if we were Hodor?
    • My website
Re: Birds
« Reply #13 on: February 17, 2009, 02:12:17 AM »
Classy.

February 17, 2009, 06:22:53 AM
Reply #14

macheteman

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Knight
  • Posts: 1938
Re: Birds
« Reply #14 on: February 17, 2009, 06:22:53 AM »
I thought this topic was about girls... nevermind

A British thing

LOL @ Jordy. Mate, thats exactly what i thought before i even opened the post but i suspected probably otherwise!

Hehehe.

we call girls "chicks" here in the states. not "birds". just chicks. and a thread titled "Birds and Chicks" would be a heck of a lot more interesting than this one...