LotR TCG Wiki → Card Sets:  All 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 → Forums:  TLHH CC

Author Topic: Proposed Errata and Discussion  (Read 43961 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

May 25, 2009, 10:02:52 PM
Reply #15

MuadDib85

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Ranger
  • Posts: 940
Proposed Errata and Discussion
« Reply #15 on: May 25, 2009, 10:02:52 PM »
"Spot an [Orc] minion to add 2 to the minion archery total. Then add an additional 2 to the minion archery total if you can spot a Free Peoples follower."

This looks good.
 :up:

but +4 to the minon archery total would maybe need a twilte cost of  [3]?
« Last Edit: May 25, 2009, 10:04:26 PM by MuadDib »

May 25, 2009, 10:13:49 PM
Reply #16

MR. Lurtzy

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Posts: 2745
  • Wouldn't it be nice if we were Hodor?
    • My website
Proposed Errata and Discussion
« Reply #16 on: May 25, 2009, 10:13:49 PM »
 :o That is still very overpowered.

May 25, 2009, 10:20:41 PM
Reply #17

MuadDib85

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Ranger
  • Posts: 940
Proposed Errata and Discussion
« Reply #17 on: May 25, 2009, 10:20:41 PM »
Do you think the card text is overpowered, or the twilite cost?

May 25, 2009, 11:16:27 PM
Reply #18

Elessar's Socks

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Knight
  • Posts: 1353
  • "I see...I look foul and feel foul. Is that it?"
Proposed Errata and Discussion
« Reply #18 on: May 25, 2009, 11:16:27 PM »
The twilight cost can be tweaked to the point where this becomes prohibitive, but I think game text in this case would cleaner to handle. Also if we get to virtual cards/errata, the print-outs will cover only the bottom half of the card, making it preferable that all errata takes place down below. Just my opinion.

:o That is still very overpowered.
That teaches people not to play followers. :fire:

Another fairly easy to track idea would be changing 2s to 1s in the game text, as I think you mentioned already. With that there might not be the need to fiddle with "for each" or the side of the followers.

May 26, 2009, 12:10:56 AM
Reply #19

legolas3333

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Posts: 2152
Proposed Errata and Discussion
« Reply #19 on: May 26, 2009, 12:10:56 AM »
You could make the original bonus 2 and the follower bonus 1 or the other way around
A Promo Saved is a Promo Earned

May 26, 2009, 01:49:01 AM
Reply #20

Smeagollum

  • Guest
Proposed Errata and Discussion
« Reply #20 on: May 26, 2009, 01:49:01 AM »
Actualy I don't mind if it has to spot a freep follower or not. Maybe we can alter it a bit in attached follower. This way you still give the sp the option to use his follwer, with the possibility that his minion be killed and that the follower will be gone. It gives the freep the option not to attach a follower. And if he does then it's his own fault.

May 26, 2009, 03:55:33 AM
Reply #21

TheJord

  • League Director
  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Posts: 2294
  • High King of Rules
    • GamesCobra
Proposed Errata and Discussion
« Reply #21 on: May 26, 2009, 03:55:33 AM »
This thread has gone completely off topic, but I'm not even sure what to split it in to...
"The rule of Gondor is mine!"

May 26, 2009, 04:00:13 AM
Reply #22

Gil-Estel

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Posts: 2267
  • Abuser of the Force
Proposed Errata and Discussion
« Reply #22 on: May 26, 2009, 04:00:13 AM »
Just give it another title. Card debate for example....:)
..."Elves seldom give unguarded advice, for advice is a dangerous gift, even from the wise to the wise, and all courses may run ill"...

May 26, 2009, 05:17:21 AM
Reply #23

Smeagollum

  • Guest
Proposed Errata and Discussion
« Reply #23 on: May 26, 2009, 05:17:21 AM »
This thread has gone completely off topic, but I'm not even sure what to split it in to...

Sorry My Fault!  :P

If You want you can pick up my suggestions (from there and on) on errata into a new topic: Errata suggestions?

May 26, 2009, 12:04:45 PM
Reply #24

MR. Lurtzy

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Posts: 2745
  • Wouldn't it be nice if we were Hodor?
    • My website
Proposed Errata and Discussion
« Reply #24 on: May 26, 2009, 12:04:45 PM »
I think FoA could simply have all 2s (except twilight cost) changed to 1s.

May 26, 2009, 01:14:14 PM
Reply #25

FingolfinFinwe

  • ****
  • Information Offline
  • Marksman
  • Posts: 507
Proposed Errata and Discussion
« Reply #25 on: May 26, 2009, 01:14:14 PM »
<----  Agrees with Lurtzy

May 29, 2009, 11:33:29 PM
Reply #26

Pepi

  • **
  • Information Offline
  • Scout
  • Posts: 87
Re: Proposed Errata and Discussion
« Reply #26 on: May 29, 2009, 11:33:29 PM »
As for the Troll keyward. Warg problem could be solved with increasing its strength(and consequently twilight cost).

May 30, 2009, 12:14:00 AM
Reply #27

MR. Lurtzy

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Posts: 2745
  • Wouldn't it be nice if we were Hodor?
    • My website
Re: Proposed Errata and Discussion
« Reply #27 on: May 30, 2009, 12:14:00 AM »
That would be overly complicated, perhaps a simple "This minion may not bear mounts" would solve that.

May 30, 2009, 12:25:47 AM
Reply #28

Smeagollum

  • Guest
Re: Proposed Errata and Discussion
« Reply #28 on: May 30, 2009, 12:25:47 AM »
it's not only this minion with overpowered minions when bearin a mount. Exerting 3x to add 3 wounds is verry killing.

Keyward is strong enough for itself in combo with mountaintrolls,

May 30, 2009, 12:29:45 AM
Reply #29

BattleWarg

  • ****
  • Information Offline
  • Marksman
  • Posts: 626
Re: Proposed Errata and Discussion
« Reply #29 on: May 30, 2009, 12:29:45 AM »
What about (for Troll's Keyward, Keeper of the Beast):

"Shadow:  Exhaust Troll's Keyward.  If you exerted Troll's Keyward, reveal your hand to add [1] for each [Orc] Troll revealed."?