LotR TCG Wiki → Card Sets:  All 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 → Forums:  TLHH CC

Author Topic: Proposed Errata and Discussion  (Read 43979 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

July 30, 2009, 11:29:19 PM
Reply #90

MR. Lurtzy

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Posts: 2745
  • Wouldn't it be nice if we were Hodor?
    • My website
Re: Proposed Errata and Discussion
« Reply #90 on: July 30, 2009, 11:29:19 PM »
It's still "spot a man".

July 31, 2009, 12:44:08 PM
Reply #91

jdizzy001

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Knight
  • Posts: 1038
Re: Proposed Errata and Discussion
« Reply #91 on: July 31, 2009, 12:44:08 PM »
Wait I thought tfs was spot a [Gondor] man?
*All posts made by jdizzy001, regardless of the thread in which they appear, are expressions of his own opinion and as such are not representative of views shared by any third party unless expressly acknowledged as such by said party.

I play LOTR SBG look at my minis!
http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.124731667611081.33577.100002227457509&l=aeb5fa3bdd

July 31, 2009, 06:31:35 PM
Reply #92

MR. Lurtzy

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Posts: 2745
  • Wouldn't it be nice if we were Hodor?
    • My website
Re: Proposed Errata and Discussion
« Reply #92 on: July 31, 2009, 06:31:35 PM »
Nope, look it up in the database, it shows the exact errata.

August 02, 2009, 03:56:45 PM
Reply #93

jdizzy001

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Knight
  • Posts: 1038
Re: Proposed Errata and Discussion
« Reply #93 on: August 02, 2009, 03:56:45 PM »
Oh, that's cool.  That makes this card super versatile
*All posts made by jdizzy001, regardless of the thread in which they appear, are expressions of his own opinion and as such are not representative of views shared by any third party unless expressly acknowledged as such by said party.

I play LOTR SBG look at my minis!
http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.124731667611081.33577.100002227457509&l=aeb5fa3bdd

November 30, 2009, 06:16:07 AM
Reply #94

Beyo

  • *
  • Information Offline
  • Orc
  • Posts: 30
Re: Proposed Errata and Discussion
« Reply #94 on: November 30, 2009, 06:16:07 AM »
For me creating such erratas are stupid. Formats like Austria are funny and good to play because you dont errata all the stuff , just limit the card pool (and Austria treated both part of the deck separately). Discussion like this will divide players - we play in Poland often in Austria format but if modification like those proposed with Namarie are accepted I will stop play LOTR . The last CRD by Decipher should be considered as last valid errata and x/r list. After all, they created and playtested the game so they should have right to decide.

November 30, 2009, 06:17:45 AM
Reply #95

ket_the_jet

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 2062
  • He/Him/His
Re: Proposed Errata and Discussion
« Reply #95 on: November 30, 2009, 06:17:45 AM »
After all, they created and playtested the game so they should have right to decide.

They created the game; however, the game went through limited playtesting and cards were built based on theory and not via testing.
-wtk