LotR TCG Wiki → Card Sets:  All 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 → Forums:  TLHH CC

Author Topic: Wraith-world (2R86), Paths Seldom Trodden (1U222)  (Read 3874 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

November 30, 2009, 11:12:47 AM
Read 3874 times

Dr. Argon

  • Guest
Wraith-world (2R86), Paths Seldom Trodden (1U222)
« on: November 30, 2009, 11:12:47 AM »
Hi everyone,

my first questions in this forum, please forgive my english, I am from Germany :)

1. Does 2R86 Wraith-world need the Ring-bearer to be in a skirmish? As there are methods of forcing the Ring-bearer to put on the ring without being in a skirmish (e.g. 2U79 Restistance Becomes Unbearable), these two cards would add great to each other.

2. 1U222 Paths Seldom Trodden allows you to replace "the fellowship's site with your version of the same site." Does this refer only to the site my opponents fellowship is at when i start my shadow phase? With 1U233 Úlairë Nelya, Lieutenant of Morgul you can replace ANY of your opponent's site, right?

November 30, 2009, 11:22:41 AM
Reply #1

TheJord

  • League Director
  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Posts: 2294
  • High King of Rules
    • GamesCobra
Re: Wraith-world (2R86), Paths Seldom Trodden (1U222)
« Reply #1 on: November 30, 2009, 11:22:41 AM »
1. No it does not, its requirements are the Ring-bearer wearing the One Ring and a Twilight Nazgul, nothing about being in a skirmish.

2. You are correct
"The rule of Gondor is mine!"

November 30, 2009, 11:40:02 AM
Reply #2

Kralik

  • Guest
Re: Wraith-world (2R86), Paths Seldom Trodden (1U222)
« Reply #2 on: November 30, 2009, 11:40:02 AM »
1. No it does not, its requirements are the Ring-bearer wearing the One Ring and a Twilight Nazgul, nothing about being in a skirmish.

Well, someone has to be in a skirmish, so you are out of luck if, for example, all of your minions are shot down by archery.

November 30, 2009, 12:16:48 PM
Reply #3

Dr. Argon

  • Guest
Re: Wraith-world (2R86), Paths Seldom Trodden (1U222)
« Reply #3 on: November 30, 2009, 12:16:48 PM »
Thank you both for making this clear!