I'm not sure if a minor character like Galdor deserves to be legendary... He isn't doing anything in the movie... perhaps he is more important in the books.
I hear where you're coming from. But I like him as legendary because he's an Elf and is going to go
into the West, never to return.
So are unique followers in the dead pile going to prevent another copy of them being played? This has implications for Dain Ironfoots gametext.
So far, this is not true. The uniqueness dead rule currently only applies to companions. So a question: should the uniqueness dead pile rule apply to ALL legendary cards?
I might be off here .... but I think there is some confusion with the Legendary keyword ... it is meant to represent uniqueness and limit the cards use, but the keyword suggests the card / persona is a legend and this is not necessarily true the way i see it. Perhaps the keyword could be switched to something else (like Unique .... boring i know but perhaps it captures the essence of the keyword). Just my 2cents.
Good points. I think I would say it most represents the fact that things are continually lost from Middle-Earth never to return – spells, places, peoples – and turn into legends.
I don't really think so, I mean, with all those legendary cards around here, you can pump bearer easily to strength +5 and more by exerting hm twice or discarding Dain.
Here's another important clarification: currently, legendary cards only go to the dead pile if they would go to the discard pile from play (if permanents) or from the void (if events). So discarding legendary cards from draw decks or hands does not put them in the dead pile.
Another question: should legendary cards go to the dead pile
whenever they're about to go to the discard pile?
Also a minor clarification. I do not intend all these legendary cards to be in the same set – these will be spread over the whole block, and I'm not sure a lot of them will even make the cut at all.
Thranduil