LotR TCG Wiki → Card Sets:  All 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 → Forums:  TLHH CC

Author Topic: Preliminary Discussion: Lady Redeemed  (Read 24371 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

February 13, 2011, 06:41:47 PM
Reply #15

Imrahil

  • ***
  • Information Offline
  • Troll
  • Posts: 164
Re: Preliminary Discussion: Lady Redeemed
« Reply #15 on: February 13, 2011, 06:41:47 PM »
Get rid of her and my lovely elves are screwed, let her stay and everything else is screwed.  I agree that she should be banned as a TLHH house rule, but that's going to force me to run a Gandalf splash.

I mean, you guys remember how it was at the end, you had to run a freeps side capable of beating corsairs, and a minion side capable of sniping Galadriel.  Get rid of Galadriel and we're still all going to have to run corsair-hate.  And for someone like me (50% of what I face is either Besiegers or Corsairs), it's a tough pill to swallow.
Never under any circumstances take a sleeping pill and a laxative on the same night.

-Dave Barry

February 13, 2011, 07:53:34 PM
Reply #16

Kralik

  • Guest
Re: Preliminary Discussion: Lady Redeemed
« Reply #16 on: February 13, 2011, 07:53:34 PM »
Perhaps it would be better to consider whether she could stay with errata. I could see her as being somewhat feasible if the cost was increased to... maybe... two exerts. Shadow Between (for example) makes one exert not enough.

February 13, 2011, 11:57:54 PM
Reply #17

Shelobplayer

  • ****
  • Information Offline
  • Bowman
  • Posts: 474
Re: Preliminary Discussion: Lady Redeemed
« Reply #17 on: February 13, 2011, 11:57:54 PM »
I think you should either ban her or leave her as she is. I always hated errata, but that's not my point here. Not everyone reads these forums, who plays on GCCG, it would only cause unnecessary conflicts (and bad gaming experience) to change her game text. On the other hand, if the deck validator marks a deck with LR illegal, there wouldn't be place for argument.

February 14, 2011, 01:55:09 AM
Reply #18

Gil-Estel

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 2267
  • Abuser of the Force
Re: Preliminary Discussion: Lady Redeemed
« Reply #18 on: February 14, 2011, 01:55:09 AM »
Agreed with that. Leave the Elves without possessionremoval, go with the old Bearded Wizard to add that to your decks!
..."Elves seldom give unguarded advice, for advice is a dangerous gift, even from the wise to the wise, and all courses may run ill"...

February 14, 2011, 03:10:16 AM
Reply #19

Thranduil

  • *******
  • Information Offline
  • Wizard
  • Posts: 4996
    • Zalman's Dungeon (blog of SF stories by Thranduil)
Re: Preliminary Discussion: Lady Redeemed
« Reply #19 on: February 14, 2011, 03:10:16 AM »
As soon as LR was released, every deck that could possibly stretch to play her was doing so. Very soon after that, every deck that could possibly stretch to play Terrible as the Dawn was playing it to kill LR.

Any card that makes everyone bend over backwards to include it in a huge variety of decks, and that is so powerful and so scary that the entire format has to be warped by everyone bending over backwards to fit in its hoser is a broken card and should be banned.

Errata can come at a later date. If we want a ruling now, I don't really see any reason that she shouldn't be banned.

Thran

February 14, 2011, 05:39:05 AM
Reply #20

Kralik

  • Guest
Re: Preliminary Discussion: Lady Redeemed
« Reply #20 on: February 14, 2011, 05:39:05 AM »
Thran has a point... ;)

February 14, 2011, 06:18:50 AM
Reply #21

Witchkingx5

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Knight
  • Posts: 1160
Re: Preliminary Discussion: Lady Redeemed
« Reply #21 on: February 14, 2011, 06:18:50 AM »
Yeah, it's kinda like Survival of the Fittest...

but still, you'll to have Tier One Decks, and as soon as LR is officially banned, you'll soon have some random dudes crying how OP Castamir of Umbar is, and how they get crushed by that Monster and bla bla bla...

So from my point of view, ban her, but do never ever ever ever again ban anything else that is legal now. Even though some cards might be strictly "better" thatn others, you just can't avoid that kinda situation. Or just go and paly Chess and start complaining about the 0.25 pawns advantage the White player has for being able to begin the game.

February 14, 2011, 07:06:26 AM
Reply #22

Kralik

  • Guest
Re: Preliminary Discussion: Lady Redeemed
« Reply #22 on: February 14, 2011, 07:06:26 AM »
Castamir of Umbar is OP with or without LR. I don't see taking LR away as really changing that much.

February 14, 2011, 08:15:24 AM
Reply #23

Inspire

  • **
  • Information Offline
  • Scout
  • Posts: 79
Re: Preliminary Discussion: Lady Redeemed
« Reply #23 on: February 14, 2011, 08:15:24 AM »
I do not play with cards from RotK and further very often, but it seems to me the simplest solution might be to just remove her reduced cost in the starting fellowship. She would still remain a great card, just a more appropriately costed one. Plus, it's likely a much easier errata for players to remember than changing her ability to remove conditions/possession.

February 14, 2011, 01:48:33 PM
Reply #24

Witchkingx5

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Knight
  • Posts: 1160
Re: Preliminary Discussion: Lady Redeemed
« Reply #24 on: February 14, 2011, 01:48:33 PM »
Castamir of Umbar is OP with or without LR. I don't see taking LR away as really changing that much.

But you don't play castamir of Umbar much besides a Corsair Deck, do you? And LR just roasts Corsairs.

February 14, 2011, 01:49:48 PM
Reply #25

Thranduil

  • *******
  • Information Offline
  • Wizard
  • Posts: 4996
    • Zalman's Dungeon (blog of SF stories by Thranduil)
Re: Preliminary Discussion: Lady Redeemed
« Reply #25 on: February 14, 2011, 01:49:48 PM »
Castamir of Umbar is OP with or without LR. I don't see taking LR away as really changing that much.

But you don't play castamir of Umbar much besides a Corsair Deck, do you? And LR just roasts Corsairs.
But that's the point. LR goes in almost any deck. Castamir only goes in Corsairs. This is one of the major reasons that I think LR is OP while Castamir is not.

Thran

February 14, 2011, 02:53:19 PM
Reply #26

Kralik

  • Guest
Re: Preliminary Discussion: Lady Redeemed
« Reply #26 on: February 14, 2011, 02:53:19 PM »
Even though I think Tubby is OP, I do not suggest that he be removed. I think the same about Cirdan, for example. LR goes much further than either of those, and messes with many, many more Shadow decks than just being a counter for Corsairs. My opinion, as it stands, is that Elves do not need LR, nor should they have her.

You might say, "but what else can I do to save myself from the Corsairs and Besiegers?"
To which I reply, "What can my poor four hobbits (non-Shadowplay) fellowship do to save themselves from the same?"

My [Shire] fellowship is vulnerable to a number of things, but other times it does quite well. That's the nature of the game. I don't think it's a problem that Elves, already having an advantage with archery and companions like Cirdan and Gilgalad, are vulnerable to certain Shadows either.

February 14, 2011, 02:55:10 PM
Reply #27

Kralik

  • Guest
Re: Preliminary Discussion: Lady Redeemed
« Reply #27 on: February 14, 2011, 02:55:10 PM »
What was Decipher thinking in making her free anyway? ???

February 14, 2011, 04:56:08 PM
Reply #28

Imrahil

  • ***
  • Information Offline
  • Troll
  • Posts: 164
Re: Preliminary Discussion: Lady Redeemed
« Reply #28 on: February 14, 2011, 04:56:08 PM »
Castamir of Umbar is OP with or without LR. I don't see taking LR away as really changing that much.

But you don't play castamir of Umbar much besides a Corsair Deck, do you? And LR just roasts Corsairs.
But that's the point. LR goes in almost any deck. Castamir only goes in Corsairs. This is one of the major reasons that I think LR is OP while Castamir is not.

Thran

The easy answer to the problem then, is to provide LR with cultural reinforcement.  Unfortunately, I think most players will agree with me when I say that cultural reinforcement alone is not enough.  The fact that "Castamir only goes with Corsairs" didn't stop everyone and their mother from playing Corsairs back in the day, just as cultural reinforcement on LR will just encourage people to play elves.

I admit that I don't really play with LR, because I too feel that the effect is too good for the cost.  In consequence I have died to Corsairs countless times.  I have been swarmed, I have been overwhelmed, I have had all my bows discarded, I have been destroyed by Under Foot, and even (insult to injury) Red Wrathed.  I just can't touch the shadow support area, and against a good Corsair side that means I will lose 80% of the time.

And I am getting tired of losing.

I understand that a ban is inevitable, and I accept that.  But bear in mind that Decipher's designers meant each set to be balanced, and that means that LR was printed as a check on other elements in the set, just as the other elements were strengthened to counter LR.

So if you ban her, just remember to make all those stupid ships into conditions, or my poor, doomed little elves will continue to sacrifice themselves in futile displays of courage.
Never under any circumstances take a sleeping pill and a laxative on the same night.

-Dave Barry

February 14, 2011, 05:07:37 PM
Reply #29

Kralik

  • Guest
Re: Preliminary Discussion: Lady Redeemed
« Reply #29 on: February 14, 2011, 05:07:37 PM »
Do you play anything besides Elves? Or other styles of Elves? My Elven discard seems to do well vs. Corsairs...