OFFICIAL POLL: Allowing certain Promos in Movie Block

[hrcho]

Discussion.

The promos in question are:

Gimli, Dwarven Delegate
Arwen, Maiden of Rivendell
Gandalf, Stormcrow
Boromir, Steward's Heir
Eomer, Forthwith Banished

I implore anyone voting to give us some explanation of their vote (especially if it's negative).

Please don't vote if you're not a player on GCCG.

[TheJord]

5 votes and no explanations.

Poll reset.

[Not a Zombie]

I like the idea of having a few extra deck building options for rohan and gondor knights/rangers. Arwen is cool, but the rest won't even be used.

[hrcho]

I don't think there was a need for reset. People do have a right to vote and not to explain themselves, even though I prefer if they do. Also, I think Kralik will check the poll at the end for any voters who are not GCCG players and remove their votes.

Btw., I didn't know we had an Official Poll section. Did you just create it or I just didn't see it?

[TheJord]

Its been here a while.

Also, I think if people want to be involved in creation of House Rules, they need to voice their opinion of why/why not they want the changes made. People have COMPLAINED that they are not being heard, then we will make it so everyone will be heard.

I don't believe these cards will break any decks, so they can be added.

[Imrahil]

I voted "No".  I know I don't officially play GCCG, but Gerontius and I accept most of the changes made on these boards in our games so I think I should have a say.

[hrcho]

I voted "No".  I know I don't officially play GCCG, but Gerontius and I accept most of the changes made on these boards in our games so I think I should have a say.

Honestly, I don't think that's ok. GCCG supports House Rules and Decipher official rules so players can choose which suits them best. Any changes made will affect House Rules only and if you don't even play on GCCG, I must say it's not really ok to vote (no matter what you voted for).

You and Gerontius can make any changes and play by any rules you want. It's your preference and the two you have to agree on what you want to play and how you want to play it.

[MR. Lurtzy]

You and Gerontius can make any changes and play by any rules you want. It's your preference and the two you have to agree on what you want to play and how you want to play it.

That's why making "official" house rules is just plain stupid.

[Kralik]

Lurtzy, you have no business here. Buzz off.

And to all: Please post with your vote -- even if it's short.

[Imrahil]

Okay, retract one vote for "no" then I guess.  I just plan on getting involved with GCCG at a later point, and I'd hate all the important decisions to be made without me. :-)

[TheJord]

If you plan on becoming part of the GCCG community, I think its pretty fair to consider your vote.

[Tbiesty]

These promos add some fun new options for decks while not adding any new mechanics, etc.  Looks good to me.

[hrcho]

Okay, retract one vote for "no" then I guess.  I just plan on getting involved with GCCG at a later point, and I'd hate all the important decisions to be made without me. :-)

If you plan on becoming part of the GCCG community, I think its pretty fair to consider your vote.

I agree with TheJord. If you do indeed plan on playing on GCCG, your vote is as good as any other. However, please decide beforehand if you even want to play by House Rules or will you keep playing by official Deciher rules. If you know you'll go the Decipher way, it's kinda pointless voting.

If you like the House Rules and wanna play by them, that's great, just please add a bit of explanation to your voting (especially if you vote No).

[Kralik]

I voted yes. I think that it's helpful for simplicity's sake to simply allow all promos from 0P1 to 0P68. Although I do think that Eomer is a bit much for .

[Ringbearer]

I voted no, mostly because of Eomer. I find him too cheap for what he does. Standard 7/3 with a nice ability cost 3 (sometimes 2). Not 1. Even at 2 I find him rather cheap compared to other 7/3 like Imrahil and Boromir by example.