This idea was brough up in the suggestions thread back in August and was met with mixed reviews. I think it sounds like a lot of fun, and so now that I have a bit more time (last term at school was surprisingly busy for me) I thought I'd make a poll to see if it's worth pushing more for.
Currently, sealed leagues use starters in order to make sure everyone has a full, coherent deck. But it reduces the amount of variance in sealed leagues, because now you're playing one of a set number of possible decks, with a couple of good cards thrown in on top. I'm not suggesting we replace sealed with starters as the standard format. But once in a blue moon, I think it would be fun to remove the starters and have a more randomized sealed league.
The product allocation would be something like this:
Week 1: 15 Boosters, plus a few fixed cards to ensure a deck can be built (Frodo, a ring, and 9 sites for sure, and then probably a few companions. If it was Fellowship block, maybe
Boromir, SoD,
Merry, FotB,
Gimli, DoE, and
Legolas PoM).
Week 2-4: 5 Boosters per week
I've included two extra options in the poll, based on the card pool we would use. "Real sets" would be something like a Fellowship block league, while "custom set" would be a card pool designed to make this sort of format work (probably using movie block cards, due to the popularity of the format combined with the size of the available card pool). The game was obviously not designed with this sort of format in mind, and so designing a set would allow us to put more companions at common, and remove a bunch of useless-for-sealed cards.
I think either option has merit, it mostly depends on what people are interested in. A potential issue with the custom set is the fact that the new set would need to be coded into gemp; I obviously don't want to ask MarcinS to do that himself, and so it would involve coordinating with him to make sure it can be done without causing a bunch of extra work for him.
Please comment below if you have any thoughts on the idea.