GateTroll, the things i said didn´t come for some crazzy attack or
inspiration, but from years and years of studying areas of science and i will be glad to explain to you my thoughts.
1-
Where Big Bang came from? No definitive answer to this, good thing in science is that you don´t part of the pressumption that you got all the answers and scientist don´t have any fear of saying: " i don´t know, maybe one day we will get the answer". The difference with religion is only that you don´t atribute that to some divine oniscient power, when you don´t have a better explanation you just say: "it´s god work". I´m not an expert at this but if you talk with some astrophysician we will simply answer somwrhing like: "nothing that we know until moment". Again, no problem if you choose the god´s option, i will respect your beliefs, but then you must respect (and try to learn about) mine.
2- Modern humans (
Homo sapiens sapiens) have a common ancestor with monkey and Neanderthals and current opinion is that Neanderthals (
Homo neanderthalis) were extinct and Homo sapiens don´t directly derive from them, but from
Homo erectus lineage. Still the fact if ever
Homo sapiens had direct contatc with Neanderthals is controverse. So i think you was precipitated in making that afirmative, for that even people that study this issue for his entire life can´t give a definitive answer (but they still trying to make theorys based on empirical data and formuling hypothesis.
3- Creationism isn´t considered science by great part of scientist international community. Even the pope had pointed that church Just this don´t tell you that creacionism sucks or rules. Be or not be considered a science (or pseudo-science) don´t means that the thing is necessarily good or bad.
Yes, in evolution theory you have many ways to test it, learn about population dinamics, genetic manipulation, Evo Devo, and even molecular clock (the last with plenty questionable aspect in my opinion) and you will see evolution hypothesis being tested.
4- Well, i belive that life could originate by chance, if that is what you speaking of. By chance, molecular compond dinamycs could change to stand against forces of entrophy and then what we call "life" can evolve (even that definition of life is a little bit tricky). Experiments have poited to that. Creacionism always ends in one prerrogative that we can´t get a answer (God´s work). I respect if you belive on creacionism, but i´m saying that it´s prerrogatives don´t explain the things so well than evolutionism for me, you may have your own beliefs. Of course Evolution theory may have many mistakes, but with adavance of it´s knowloge i guess things get even more logic and clear (even that the "real truth behind life and it´s origins could never be solved).
5- The fact is: tested or not it will ever end in what you belive or not. How can you tell what is "the truth"? Sorry, but you can´t, then you have to rely on theorys that explain the reality you observe (throught your senses) and that´s when evolution x creationism show up.
I have to say that evolution = scince. Like every theory it may have lot of errors and misunderstandings interpretations, but in fact evolution is consider a well stabilished stream of the the scince Biology. Again you can choose not to belive on this theory, but please keep in mind that when you said "Evolution is not scince" you are against hundreds and hundreds of scientist that use empirical methods to do research, so please don´t say that this is "utter stupidity"
I have one curiosity i like to ask to you: How older you think Earth is? and how older the first animals we can call humans are? You belive that creationism is more related to other fields of scince (Biology, Chemistry, Physics, Geology, etc...) than evolutionism?
Topic: Do We Have any Evolutionists (Read 5082 times)
