LotR TCG Wiki → Card Sets:  All 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 → Forums:  TLHH CC

Author Topic: Thranduil's Virtual DC Contest #2 (Contest finished!)  (Read 103106 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

February 24, 2009, 08:21:51 AM
Reply #135

Braler

  • **
  • Information Offline
  • Scout
  • Posts: 79
Re: Thranduil's Virtual DC Contest #2 (Voting on Round 5 - Banished/Leechcraft)
« Reply #135 on: February 24, 2009, 08:21:51 AM »
1- I like how it matches the flavor of the card
9- Again, very flavorful but also pretty powerful if you have Grima
5- Not quite as strong but still very good i would say

February 24, 2009, 09:09:46 AM
Reply #136

ElvenSpearman21

  • *
  • Information Offline
  • Orc
  • Posts: 26
  • Elven Spearmen scythed down Mordor Orcs.
Re: Thranduil's Virtual DC Contest #2 (Voting on Round 5 - Banished/Leechcraft)
« Reply #136 on: February 24, 2009, 09:09:46 AM »
 Can we vote if we didn't submit one? If we can, here is my vote.

 1
 9
 7
With deadly precision, Elven Spearman kept the Orcs at bay.

February 24, 2009, 03:10:20 PM
Reply #137

Anvar

  • ****
  • Information Offline
  • Marksman
  • Posts: 547
  • Tzeentch's Chosen
Re: Thranduil's Virtual DC Contest #2 (Voting on Round 5 - Banished/Leechcraft)
« Reply #137 on: February 24, 2009, 03:10:20 PM »
1 - Far too specific, which was, I believe, against the rules for this round. What do you do when your playing an Elf deck or a Hobbit deck? The idea was to make these general cards.

2 - Great banishment flavour.

3 - a 0 cost condition with no spotting requirements with no limit per bearer and -2 resistance? No cultural enforcement there. Otherwise the flavour of losing a fight leading to banishment is quite good. I might have preferred this as a response event.

4 - a drain on resources is good flavour but I'm not sure about the condition discard.

5 - a bit too painful perhaps. I'd prefer this as a regroup action. Otherwise I really like the flavour of it.

6 - Good flavour of strength draining away.

7 - A bit boring.

8 - Ouch! Now this is a card you could build a deck around. Might be a bit good but I suppose keeping two Isengard men to the regroup could be hard.

9 - the idea is good but the cost in terms of exertions and the cost to prevent it both seem a bit too high.


So all in all:

5
2
8
"There are worlds out there where the sky is burning, and the sea's asleep, and the rivers dream; people made of smoke and cities made of song. Somewhere there's danger, somewhere there's injustice, somewhere else the tea's getting cold. Come on, Ace. We've got work to do."
-Doctor Who

February 24, 2009, 04:47:15 PM
Reply #138

Thranduil

  • *******
  • Information Offline
  • Wizard
  • Posts: 4996
    • Zalman's Dungeon (blog of SF stories by Thranduil)
Re: Thranduil's Virtual DC Contest #2 (Voting on Round 5 - Banished/Leechcraft)
« Reply #138 on: February 24, 2009, 04:47:15 PM »
Can we vote if we didn't submit one? If we can, here is my vote.
Of course you can! In fact, I'd love it if you did now and often in the future! :)

Thranduil

February 25, 2009, 07:08:55 AM
Reply #139

Gate Troll

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Ranger
  • Posts: 971
Re: Thranduil's Virtual DC Contest #2 (Voting on Round 5 - Banished/Leechcraft)
« Reply #139 on: February 25, 2009, 07:08:55 AM »
#1
(0) Leechcraft (V) [Isengard]
Condition
Strength: -2
Spell.
To play, exert Grima or an [Isengard] Man. Plays on an unbound Man
While bearer is skirmishing an [Isengard] Man, bearer cannot use skirmish special abilities
At the start of each turn while bearer is Théoden, he must exert.
"'Your leechcraft ere long would have had me walking on all fours like a beast.'"
4 V 157

Where is the 'limit one per bearer'? Way too OP and cheap. Stack 4 on anybody and they're worse than useless.  >:(
:down:

#2
(0) Banished [Isengard]
Condition
Spell.
To play exert Saruman or an [Isengard] Man. Bearer must be an unbound companion.
Bearer may not participate in archery fire or skirmishes.
Maneuver: Exert bearer to allow bearer to participate in archery fire and skirmishes untill the regroup phase. 
"'Oh, but this is not from me - it comes from the King. He signed it this morning.'"
4 V 139

I like this one. Not too powerful, though I don't think it should be a spell ;D :up: :up:

#3
(0) Banished (V) [Isengard]
Condition
Resistance: -2
Bearer must be an unbound companion.
While bearer is skirmishing an [Isengard] Man, the Free Peoples player may not play skirmish events.
Response: If bearer loses a skirmish involving an [Isengard] Man, return bearer to its owner's hand.
"'Oh, but this is not from me - it comes from the King. He signed it this morning.'"
4 V 139

A bit unwieldy, but I like it. The skirmish events part probably should have been written something like:
'Bearer may not affected by free people's skirmish events.' I do like it though.  ;)
  :up:

#4
(0) Leechcraft (V) [Isengard]
Condition
Spell. To play, exert Gríma or Saruman. Bearer must be an unbound companion. Limit 1 per bearer.
At the start of each skirmish involving bearer, the Free Peoples player must choose to either make bearer strength -4 until the regroup phase or discard a Free Peoples condition.
"‘But do not weary yourself, or tax too heavily your strength. Let others deal with these irksome guests.'"
4 V 157

It should be more expensive. I like the idea, but it needs to be toned down.  :-|  :down::up:

#5
(0) Banished (V) [Isengard]
Event • Maneuver
Exert your Man or Wizard to return a companion (except the Ring-bearer) to its owner's hand. The Free Peoples player may add 2 burdens to prevent this.
"'Oh, but this is not from me - it comes from the King. He signed it this morning.'"
4 V 139

Finally, a banished that isn't a condition. I really like this one, flavorful and cool.  =D> :up: :up:

#6
(0) Leechcraft (V) [Isengard]
Condition
To play spot Gríma or exert an [Isengard] minion. Bearer must be a companion. Limit 1 per companion.
Each time bearer wins a skirmish, exert bearer.
Bearer is strength -1 for each wound on them.
"'Your leechcraft ere long would have had me walking on all fours like a beast.'"
4 V 157

I like it but I think it should be a Spell. Nice card.  8-)  :up:

#7
(0) Banished (V) [Isengard]
Condition • Support Area
While skirmishing an [Isengard] Man, bearer is strength -2 and resistance -2.
Response: If you play an [Isengard] Man, you may transfer this condition from your support area to an unbound companion. Limit 1 per bearer.
"'Oh, but this is not from me - it comes from the King. He signed it this morning.'"
4 V 139

I really don't like this one. It doesn't fit at all with the idea of banishment, me dislikey.
:-X :down::down:

#8
(0) Banished (V) [Isengard]
Event • Regroup
Discard 2 [Isengard] Men and spot a companion (except the Ring-bearer) with resistance 4 or less to remove that companion from the game.
"'Oh but this is not from me -  it comes from the King. he signed it this morning.'"
4 V 139

I don't quite get the point of this one; why not discard it instead?   :-k  :up: :down:


#9
(0) Banished (V) [Isengard]
Event • Maneuver
Exert two [Isengard] Men (or spot Gríma) to spot a companion. Until the regroup phase, that companion cannot participate in archery fire or skirmishes. The Free Peoples player may discard a companion to prevent this.
"'Oh but this is not from me- it comes from the King. He signed it this morning"'
4 V 139

I think this one is not as good as the previous Banished event but I still like it.   :)  :up:

So, my vote is:
2
5
6

February 25, 2009, 12:26:20 PM
Reply #140

chompers

  • ****
  • Information Offline
  • Marksman
  • Posts: 561
Re: Thranduil's Virtual DC Contest #2 (Voting on Round 5 - Banished/Leechcraft)
« Reply #140 on: February 25, 2009, 12:26:20 PM »
9
2
5

February 25, 2009, 12:42:37 PM
Reply #141

MR. Lurtzy

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Posts: 2745
  • Wouldn't it be nice if we were Hodor?
    • My website
Re: Thranduil's Virtual DC Contest #2 (Voting on Round 5 - Banished/Leechcraft)
« Reply #141 on: February 25, 2009, 12:42:37 PM »
8
5
9
« Last Edit: February 25, 2009, 12:49:05 PM by MR. Lurtzy »

February 25, 2009, 12:43:55 PM
Reply #142

Gate Troll

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Ranger
  • Posts: 971
Re: Thranduil's Virtual DC Contest #2 (Voting on Round 5 - Banished/Leechcraft)
« Reply #142 on: February 25, 2009, 12:43:55 PM »
What's your third choice? :D

February 25, 2009, 12:44:47 PM
Reply #143

MR. Lurtzy

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Posts: 2745
  • Wouldn't it be nice if we were Hodor?
    • My website
Re: Thranduil's Virtual DC Contest #2 (Voting on Round 5 - Banished/Leechcraft)
« Reply #143 on: February 25, 2009, 12:44:47 PM »
Honestly, I didn't like any other ones.

February 25, 2009, 12:46:54 PM
Reply #144

Thranduil

  • *******
  • Information Offline
  • Wizard
  • Posts: 4996
    • Zalman's Dungeon (blog of SF stories by Thranduil)
Re: Thranduil's Virtual DC Contest #2 (Voting on Round 5 - Banished/Leechcraft)
« Reply #144 on: February 25, 2009, 12:46:54 PM »
Honestly, I didn't like any other ones.
I'd quite like a 3rd choice, even if it's only the one you dislike the least! :)

Thranduil

February 25, 2009, 12:48:52 PM
Reply #145

MR. Lurtzy

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Posts: 2745
  • Wouldn't it be nice if we were Hodor?
    • My website
Re: Thranduil's Virtual DC Contest #2 (Voting on Round 5 - Banished/Leechcraft)
« Reply #145 on: February 25, 2009, 12:48:52 PM »
Updated my above post then. :up:

March 02, 2009, 12:13:01 PM
Reply #146

Thranduil

  • *******
  • Information Offline
  • Wizard
  • Posts: 4996
    • Zalman's Dungeon (blog of SF stories by Thranduil)
I just realised that the voting deadline is the end of today! I need votes from AP, EL and SoP!

Speaking of which... :whistle:

1) 2 - a cool way to represent banishment. I think making it a spell overeager though... ;)
2) 6 - definitely feeling the leeching! :mrgreen:
3) 3 - I think a so far undervalued card which has excellent ideas and well represents banishment in my mind. Needs to lose some power level, but I think the potential is there for a cool card. :up:

Thranduil

March 02, 2009, 01:07:31 PM
Reply #147

sickofpalantirs

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Useful Spammer
  • Posts: 8880
  • one spammer to rule them all
3
5
2
Felipe Musco:
(after all, it's a CHARITY organization, I still have SOME principles, even having gone through Law School... :P),
Elf Lvr:
Bit of a scrawny Iowan kid with an unhealthy artifact obsession. Oh, and a God of Spam. In a good way.
Ahhh!!! SoP, you're a genius!!! :gp: ~Menace64
SoP's Trade List
Like Muscle Cars? Check out themusclecarplace.com

March 02, 2009, 05:47:22 PM
Reply #148

Elf_Lvr

  • ******
  • Information Offline
  • Lord
  • Posts: 3628
  • Rhythmic Ringwraith
2
5
9
Happy Hunting!
Remember Cobracards.com.
Thou cannot unjack what doth hath been jacked. - Menace64
"To die's the day worth livin' for!"
Maybe you guys can find a bard and have your story of heroic Balrog proximity put into verse.

March 03, 2009, 05:06:58 AM
Reply #149

Anonymous Prodigy

  • *******
  • Information Offline
  • Wizard
  • Posts: 4318
  • Former Moderator
2
6
3