guilty as charged. Now lets review some DCs.
Thanks SoP! It's good to have your opinions again!
thats pretty powerful, even for a rare. not sure I like the vitality plus either, it was readily abusable with wargs and I'm not sure its a good idea. I think the cards is more than powerful enough without it. I don't have much feel for the flavor of men in this set, but I;m not sure about that last ability either.
What this is is a top-down design. I started from the essence of what a Mûmak does: it gives you more power (strength bonus), makes you harder to kill (vitality bonus), scares everyone facing it (resistance reduction) and causes havoc when it dies (wounding clause). I can see that it might be too powerful, but I'd like to keep the flavour intact.
I eagerly await more developements
Very few developments on this, I'm afraid. This is just laying groundwork for things that could be developed later.
in skirmish? haven't seen much yet, but aside from to stop the double move, how is that really useful?
If you look he's also an aggressor, making stuff cheaper during the skirmish phase. There are multiple ways of playing minions in the skirmish phase, although these appear to be mainly in the first set and not this one (though
Freca is a good example)... I might need to rectify this in
Back to the Light.
ah throwbacks, how I love them. Odesn't seem to deserve a R though.
My thought was that
Morgul Whelp was one of the most powerful and sought after uncommons in RotK, and could therefore easily deserve a rare slot. It might perhaps do better to gain some power over the old card, however, if it's been promoted. Perhaps +5/+7?
I'd like something like the freeps may choose to exert the RB or add a burden/2 threats ish.
I like these suggestions. Something I will think about putting in.
could it actually affect your starting fellowship?
Yeah I think so. Toil acts when you play the card, and you do play your starting fellowship (except for the RB).
I'd like or discard a follower personally.
The reason there's basically no follower hate in this block is because there are no followers. I made this decision because I wanted the set to be draftable (and having tested it, I think it pretty much is) and so the percentage of characters had to be exceedingly high, and followers just couldn't make the cut. If this was a real set, what I would do is follow this block up with a Reflections II (given that Reflections I would have just gone out of standard) which would bring back followers with a
vengeance.
in twilight? or with twilight? so the freeps could assign them to another companion that had twilight? does a need a provision for returning it to the support area? how does this work if you have a unique sauron in play?
The twilight thing is a wording change I thought about introducing and I expected no one to notice! You exceeded my expectations in that regard!

Basically, I thought the terminology "twilight card" or "twilight minion" was a bit unflavourful, so I thought I'd go for something with a lot of more imagery like "minion in twilight". This is the source of your confusion here, I think. I'm not sure how it works with a unique Sauron... In fact, I might just get rid of that clause...
I throw in exert X companions with...to heal the Rb X times and remove X burdens. Its easier to understand like that.
I know what you mean. The reason it's worded the way it is is because all the other components of that cycle are also worded according to the same template.
Thanks again. I'll make some changes perhaps tomorrow.
Thranduil