I really don't see anypoint for not having a pc. It really are non-arguments. If you've got a pc then it would be obvious to me that you make two format's (in this case I mean different format's then usually is meant here, but don't know how to call it otherwise):
1 Traditional as it is now with current rulings and by decipher sanctioned formats and no Austrian format and no altered x-list, r-list and errata. For people who like it as it is.
2 an expanded post decipher format (section?) with new gameplay, extended ruling and stuff. also v-sets. For people who would like to see the game develop and evolve.
Both can be played and everybody can enjoy the game he likes the most. I agree on Ket that we might not need more then this site. we can do this at tlhh, sure.. no problem. But what i think a pc is great for us is that it's easier to get more organized gameplay cq tournaments. I think tournaments would add to bring in new players. Also you need to keep people interrested. With no new cards it would be harder, not impossible, but more difficult. Also it would be nice to have a ratinglist again. You can all do this at tlhh. actually we allready do those things, but we don't do it organized. A pc should control this so people like ket and his minions/followers are protected that their needs are guaranteed. But it would also give the option to the others to do the things they would like, by example make officious virtual sets. There's no harm in that.
Actually everything Ket says is more reason to have a PC. A pc is there for organization and ballance and supporting it's players in it's needs. Nothing more.
What Ket is doing now is to say it's not nescesarry to have a pc and it will damage the game, but then you forfill only the needs of just one part of our player community and that is selfish. With a pc we can do both! And service both groups needs. actually ket should be in the council!
Only thing I say is that I favour a pc, but that I have big doubts of seeing it happen, because there is a lack of input imo and the endless discussion between the Jay and the nay's. So if people want a pc I think you should just start one, temporarely ignore they nays (Does still mean that the pc still needs to concider both needs) and start things up. If it is interresting people will come and will start to trust a pc. If it doesn't then the pc will die automaticly and no harm is done, because we can allways fallback to what we have. Did it harm Star Wars ccg: no. Did it harm Star Trek ccg: no.
Wizards is losing their license for SW miniatures and people are allready organizing themselves for post-wizards. So why don't we. A pc doesn't mean that you have to play it in the pc format. You can always play how it is now. But you give the option to the others, like Thranduill, me, chompers and others to do what they would like and because you do this organized you/we can control this.
Also a pc can repair thing organized. Ket is against a pc, but still asks for example:
Why is Sting banned but Glamdring (1R75) is not?
-wtk
That's exactly the reason why a pc is needed: to get general agreement on some matters.
The more the nays say nay, actually is the more reason why a pc is needed.