Article Feedback

[Dictionary]

Added a bit to Plains. I changed support/counter to simply interact with - I don't think specific cards really counter site keywords, the only thing to do is switch out the site (Traveled Leader etc.) or use something like Destroyed Homestead, but these are generic and not specific to any one keyword, so it's pointless putting them on every site keyword page.

[Enabran]

http://lotrtcgwiki.com/wiki/easterling is online :-)

[Enabran]

Today I created the pages for the Spell and Weather Keywords.
But now I need your help. Weather. is an unloaded Keyword and I added it to the unloaded Keyword table but how can I get the wiki to auto-interlink the Weather Keyword on the cards gametext?

[Dictionary]

The wiki should autolink keywords by itself I think. Kralik or TelTura would know how to set up that kind of thing, but sadly I do not, aside from doing it manually, which would be arduous.

[Enabran]

You cannot do it manually. It is hidden somewhere in the deepest database...
look here:
http://lotrtcgwiki.com/wiki/lotr01123
Gametext: Spell is autolinked. Next Keyword is Weather. This Keyword is not linked and there is no way to edit it.
Kralik and all the others have overseen this unloaded Keyword because it is overseen by decipher itself. The keyword is not named in its unloaded keyword list.
I have written a PM to Kralik but do not know if he will read it or if he will react to it.
Are you able to send him an email?
How about TelTura? is he active?
What this Wiki needs is an active Admin...

[Dictionary]

Yeah Kralik would be the best bet, he's at least on every few months. I don't think he's really got the zeal for this project anymore though.

TelTura kinda disappeared. He was around reading and giving input from time to time, then he just vanished. Hopefully it was just lack of interest and not because something terrible happened.

[Dictionary]

Mount Doom, Sirannon Ruins, Get On and Get Away now have articles.

[Enabran]

I changed the unloaded keyword table and created an item class table.
Changed the layout from the most Articles related to item Class (Armor, box, etc) and created a List for Rings and Staff

Last on my list was Support Area Class.
But there is a little Problem. Introduced in Set 9 some Possessions and Artifacts prior are Classless with the sentence "Plays to your support Area"
Are such Cards treated as Cards with the Support Area Class?

And the next Problem that possibly only Kralik can solve: When you klick on an Armor like Armor of the White City you see the line:
Card Type: Possession • Armor
When you klick on Armor you will be linked to the card Armor not to this page
http://lotrtcgwiki.com/wiki/armor

[Dictionary]

We can do what was done for the Fellowship keyword, with a disambiguation line on Armor's page. I tried putting that in, but if it looks bad we can just revert it.

[Enabran]

it is the best solution we have at the moment. Thank you

[Phallen Cassidy]

I think the section for Ranged Weapons is extremely detailed, but perhaps out of place. "Cards that Interact with Archery Fire and Archers" really belongs in the Archery Phase page, it seems to me. I'd instead put something along the lines of "For other cards which add or subtract from the archery total, see here" in the Ranged Weapons section.

Likewise, having a whole section on cards which benefit possessions as a whole seems out of place, and should be moved to the Possessions article with another note (or perhaps just adding to the same note).

Orc Bowmen is perhaps related to Ranged Weapons, but by no means belongs in that article. However, cards which interact directly with archers like Relentless Charge might make sense to keep around as most ranged weapons make bearers archers. I didn't want to rearrange things on my own, so thoughts?

[Dictionary]

I don't mind it being detailed, but I kinda see your point. I think that the Ranged Weapons page is based on the Hand Weapons one though, and that one is one of the older pages. I think Durin's Heir filled out most of the Ranged Weapons page, so'd I'd be interested to hear his thoughts.

[Dictionary]

Is it worth putting Destructive Orc under "Cards that support Artifacts" because he uses artifacts, even though no artifacts were printed?

[Phallen Cassidy]

Is it worth putting Destructive Orc under "Cards that support Artifacts" because he uses artifacts, even though no artifacts were printed?

I would say not, I think it would just be confusing.

[TelTura]

TelTura kinda disappeared. He was around reading and giving input from time to time, then he just vanished. Hopefully it was just lack of interest and not because something terrible happened.

Heh, sorry, my activity goes through ebbs and flows. I mean, I mostly didn't keep up because after checking in frequently and seeing no changes for months at a time...it starts to seem like it's not worthwhile.  I don't know how my email notifications got interrupted, however; it looks like a huge amount of work has been put in!  

Enabran (or at least I assume it was Enabran) contacted me via email letting me know about the issues here.  I've reached out to Kralik, but it might be about a month before he responds, based on his informal not-resignation.  We'll see what he says once he does.

If anyone needs to contact me and it looks like I haven't responded to PM, feel free to email me at hyperlink <dot> teltura <at> gmail <dot> com.